Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 27:7:e452.
doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.452. eCollection 2021.

A systematic review of automated pre-processing, feature extraction and classification of cardiotocography

Shahad Al-Yousif  1   2 , Ariep Jaenul  3 , Wisam Al-Dayyeni  1 , Ah Alamoodi  4 , Ihab Jabori  5 , Nooritawati Md Tahir  6 , Ali Amer Ahmed Alrawi  7 , Zafer Cömert  8 , Nael A Al-Shareefi  9 , Abbadullah H Saleh  10
Affiliations

A systematic review of automated pre-processing, feature extraction and classification of cardiotocography

Shahad Al-Yousif et al. PeerJ Comput Sci. .

Abstract

Context: The interpretations of cardiotocography (CTG) tracings are indeed vital to monitor fetal well-being both during pregnancy and childbirth. Currently, many studies are focusing on feature extraction and CTG classification using computer vision approach in determining the most accurate diagnosis as well as monitoring the fetal well-being during pregnancy. Additionally, a fetal monitoring system would be able to perform detection and precise quantification of fetal heart rate patterns.

Objective: This study aimed to perform a systematic review to describe the achievements made by the researchers, summarizing findings that have been found by previous researchers in feature extraction and CTG classification, to determine criteria and evaluation methods to the taxonomies of the proposed literature in the CTG field and to distinguish aspects from relevant research in the field of CTG.

Methods: Article search was done systematically using three databases: IEEE Xplore digital library, Science Direct, and Web of Science over a period of 5 years. The literature in the medical sciences and engineering was included in the search selection to provide a broader understanding for researchers.

Results: After screening 372 articles, and based on our protocol of exclusion and inclusion criteria, for the final set of articles, 50 articles were obtained. The research literature taxonomy was divided into four stages. The first stage discussed the proposed method which presented steps and algorithms in the pre-processing stage, feature extraction and classification as well as their use in CTG (20/50 papers). The second stage included the development of a system specifically on automatic feature extraction and CTG classification (7/50 papers). The third stage consisted of reviews and survey articles on automatic feature extraction and CTG classification (3/50 papers). The last stage discussed evaluation and comparative studies to determine the best method for extracting and classifying features with comparisons based on a set of criteria (20/50 articles).

Discussion: This study focused more on literature compared to techniques or methods. Also, this study conducts research and identification of various types of datasets used in surveys from publicly available, private, and commercial datasets. To analyze the results, researchers evaluated independent datasets using different techniques.

Conclusions: This systematic review contributes to understand and have insight into the relevant research in the field of CTG by surveying and classifying pertinent research efforts. This review will help to address the current research opportunities, problems and challenges, motivations, recommendations related to feature extraction and CTG classification, as well as the measurement of various performance and various data sets used by other researchers.

Keywords: Acceleration; Baseline; Cardiotocography; Classification; Diagnoses; Feature extraction; Fetal Heart Rate; Uterine contraction; Variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Article selection, search query and inclusion criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The research literature taxonomy on automatic feature extraction and classification of cardiotocography.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Articles number based on main categories and the database.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The number of articles in each category based on the year of publication.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Articles number based on the author’s affiliation.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Motivation categories of feature extraction and cardiotocography classification.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Recommended categories of feature extraction and cardiotocography classification.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arif M. Classification of cardiotocograms using random forest classifier and selection of important features from cardiotocogram signal. Biomaterials and Biomechanics in Bioengineering. 2015;2(3):173–183. doi: 10.12989/bme.2015.2.3.173. - DOI
    1. Bhatia M, Mahtani KR, Nunan D, Reddy A. A cross-sectional comparison of three guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2017;138(1):89–93. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12161. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chamidah N, Wasito I. Fetal state classification from cardiotocography based on feature extraction using hybrid K-Means and support vector machine,. International conference on advanced computer science and information systems (ICACSIS); Piscataway. 2015. pp. 37–41.
    1. Chen C-Y, Yu C, Chang C-C, Lin C-W. Comparison of a novel computerized analysis program and visual interpretation of cardiotocography. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(12):e112296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112296. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chinnasamy S, Muthusamy C, Gopal G. An outlier based bi-level neural network classification system for improved classification of cardiotocogram data. Life Science Journal. 2013;10(1):244–251.

LinkOut - more resources