Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;128(13):2127-2130.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16750. Epub 2021 May 31.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women undergoing caesarean section: a commentary on new evidence that fuels the debate

Affiliations

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women undergoing caesarean section: a commentary on new evidence that fuels the debate

N Hyldig et al. BJOG. 2021 Dec.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Tuuli MG, Liu J, Tita ATN, Longo S, Trudell A, Carter EB, et al. Effect of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy vs standard wound dressing on surgical-site infection in obese women after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;324:1180-9.
    1. Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, et al. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. Br J Surg 2016;103:477-86.
    1. Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, Mogensen O, Bille C, Sorensen JA, et al. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2019;126:628-35.
    1. Hyldig N, Joergensen JS, Wu C, Bille C, Vinter CA, Sorensen JA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation. BJOG 2019;126:619-27.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ 1995;311:485.

LinkOut - more resources