Effect of focused cardiopulmonary ultrasonography on clinical outcome of septic shock: a randomized study
- PMID: 33990145
- PMCID: PMC8127760
- DOI: 10.1177/03000605211013176
Effect of focused cardiopulmonary ultrasonography on clinical outcome of septic shock: a randomized study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of focused ultrasonography on clinical outcomes of septic shock.
Methods: Patients with septic shock were randomized into an integrated cardiopulmonary ultrasonography (ICUS) group and conventional (CON) group. Within 1 hour of admission, the ICUS group underwent ICUS examination for hemodynamic decision-making, while the CON group received standard treatment. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality after admission. The secondary endpoints were cumulative fluid administration in the first 6, 24, and 72 hours; use of vasoactive drugs; lactate clearance; duration of ventilation; and ICU stay.
Results: Ninety-four qualified patients were enrolled (ICUS group, 49; CON group, 45). ICUS showed no significant effect on 28-day mortality. Within the initial 6 hours, the ICUS group tended to have a higher fluid balance and fluid intake than the CON group. The duration of vasopressor support was shorter in the ICUS group. There were no differences in the cumulative fluid infusion within 24 or 72 hours, lactate clearance, ICU stay, or duration of ventilation.
Conclusions: The initially focused ICUS did not affect the clinical outcomes of septic shock, but it tended to be associated with a higher fluid balance within the initial 6 hours and shorter duration of vasopressor support.
Keywords: Focused ultrasonography; clinical outcome; early goal-directed therapy; hemodynamic monitoring; septic shock; severe sepsis.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



References
-
- Weng L, Zeng XY, Yin P, et al.. Sepsis-related mortality in China: a descriptive analysis. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44: 1071–1080. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5203-z. - PubMed
-
- Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al.. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 304–377. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. - PubMed
-
- Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D, et al.. A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1549–1560. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3822-1. - PubMed
-
- Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al.. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1301–1311. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. - PubMed
-
- Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, et al.. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock - a patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 2223–2234. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701380. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources