Efficacy and safety of jakinibs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33990888
- DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05686-8
Efficacy and safety of jakinibs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of jakinibs for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of jakinibs in RA patients were eligible. The effective outcome was RA improvement to reach an American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% (ACR20/50/70) response rate at weeks 12 and 24 after treatment. The safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuations due to adverse events, infections, and serious infections.
Results: Twenty-eight randomized, double-blind, controlled trials including 14,500 patients were included. At both weeks 12 and 24, the pooled analysis suggested effective treatment with jakinibs, represented as an increased clinical response of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70. Subgroup analysis based on different types of jakinibs demonstrated that only peficitinib treatment had no impact on the clinical response of ACR50 or ACR70 at week 12. Jakinibs were associated with an increased incidence of infections at week 12 and TEAEs and infections at week 24. No increase in the risk of SAEs, discontinuations due to adverse events, or serious infections was observed in comparisons between treatment with jakinibs and treatment with placebo in these patients.
Conclusions: Jakinibs are efficacious and well tolerated in RA patients up to 24 weeks, although they are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. Key Points • ACR20/50/70 in patients treated with jakinibs was significantly higher than those in patients treated with placebo. • No difference in ACR50/70 was observed in patients with RA treated with peficitinib and placebo. • Jakinibs are beneficial and well tolerated in RA treatment.
Keywords: Efficacy; Jakinib; Meta-analysis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Safety.
© 2021. International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3).Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Oct;78(10):1320-1332. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215163. Epub 2019 Jul 26. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 31350270 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Adalimumab plus methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.].Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;48(11):916-21. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 20079321 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Jan;40(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00863-9. Clin Drug Investig. 2020. PMID: 31602572 Review.
-
Adalimumab, a fully human anti tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, and concomitant standard antirheumatic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results of STAR (Safety Trial of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis).J Rheumatol. 2003 Dec;30(12):2563-71. J Rheumatol. 2003. PMID: 14719195 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of IL-17 inhibitors in two populations of rheumatoid arthritis patients: biologic-naïve or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor inadequate responders.Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2747-2756. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04608-z. Epub 2019 Jun 4. Clin Rheumatol. 2019. PMID: 31165341
Cited by
-
Systematic review of Janus kinases inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: methodology, reporting, and quality of evidence evaluation.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 25;15:1459511. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1459511. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39386036 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijlsma J, Burmester G, Chatzidionysiou K, Dougados M, Nam J, Ramiro S, Voshaar M, van Vollenhoven R, Aletaha D, Aringer M, Boers M, Buckley CD, Buttgereit F, Bykerk V, Cardiel M, Combe B, Cutolo M, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Emery P, Finckh A, Gabay C, Gomez-Reino J, Gossec L, Gottenberg JE, Hazes JMW, Huizinga T, Jani M, Karateev D, Kouloumas M, Kvien T, Li Z, Mariette X, McInnes I, Mysler E, Nash P, Pavelka K, Poor G, Richez C, van Riel P, Rubbert-Roth A, Saag K, da Silva J, Stamm T, Takeuchi T, Westhovens R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D (2017) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 76(6):960–977 - PubMed - DOI
-
- Garces S, Demengeot J (2018) The immunogenicity of biologic therapies. Curr Probl Dermatol.:5337–5348
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical