Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;40(3):661-673.
doi: 10.1002/jor.25101. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

Identification and coregulation pattern analysis of long noncoding RNAs following subacute spinal cord injury

Affiliations

Identification and coregulation pattern analysis of long noncoding RNAs following subacute spinal cord injury

Wenzhao Wang et al. J Orthop Res. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been demonstrated to play critical regulatory roles in posttranscriptional and transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic cells. However, the characteristics of many lncRNAs, particularly their expression patterns in the lesion epicenter of spinal tissues following subacute spinal cord injury (SCI), remain unclear. In this study, we determined the expression profiles of lncRNAs in the lesion epicenter of spinal tissues after traumatic SCI and predicted latent regulatory networks. Standard Allen's drop surgery was conducted on mice, and hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to observe the damaged area. High-throughput sequencing was performed to identify the differential expression profiles of lncRNAs. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was conducted to evaluate the quality of the sequencing results. Bioinformatics analyses, including Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis, coexpression analysis, and protein-protein interaction analysis, were performed. Targeted binding of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA was predicted by TargetScan and miRanda. A total of 230 differentially expressed lncRNAs were identified and preliminarily verified, and some potential regulatory networks were constructed. These findings improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying subacute SCI; differentially expressed lncRNAs are closely involved in pathophysiological processes by regulating multiple pathways. Further studies are essential for revealing the exact mechanism underlying competing endogenous RNA pathways in vivo and in vitro.

Keywords: bioinformatics; long noncoding RNA; regulatory network; subacute spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hematoxylin and eosin staining of spinal cord samples, Sham group (A), 1 day after spinal cord injury (B), and 7 days after spinal cord injury(C) (Scar bars in low‐power field =200 µm, Scar bar in high‐power field = 100 µm)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the analysis pipeline. lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; mRNA, messenger RNA; miRNA, microRNA
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genome Mapping and Genome‐wide identification. Distribution of lncRNAs in the genome of different samples. There are six layers from the outside to the inside, and each layer shows the chromosome distribution and expression of lncRNAs of one sample. The outer three layers represent the SCI group, and the inner three layers represent the Sham group. The height of the column in each layer represents the expression level, and the higher the expression level, the higher the column height (A). RNA distribution of six types of lncRNAs along each chromosome. Known lncRNAs (class code = , depicted in orange), intronic lncRNAs (class code i, depicted in light green), lncRNAs sharing a reference with at least 1 splice junction (class code j, depicted in the dark green), lncRNA of generic exonic overlap with a reference transcript (class code o, depicted in blue), intergenic lncRNA (class code u, depicted in violet), and antisense lncRNA (class code x, depicted in pink) are presented in physical bins of 500 kb for each chromosome (B). Heatmap of top differentially expressed lncRNAs (C). Barplot of DE lncRNAs (D). Volcano plots showing variance in differentially expressed lncRNA (E). Red and blue points indicate up‐ and downregulated lncRNAs, respectively. DE, differentially expressed; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA
Figure 4
Figure 4
Validation of differential lncRNA, miRNA, and mRNA expression. Sequencing results of lncRNAs (A), miRNAs (C), and mRNA (E); qRT‐PCR validation of putative lncRNAs (B), miRNAs (D), and mRNAs (F). mean ± SD, n = 3, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001 (two sample t‐test). lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; mRNA, messenger RNA; miRNA, microRNA; qRT‐PCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Figure 5
Figure 5
Basic property comparison of lncRNAs and mRNAs. Exon numbers of lncRNAs and mRNAs (A). Transcript lengths of lncRNAs and mRNAs (B). ORF lengths of lncRNAs and mRNAs (C) and (D). Expression levels of lncRNAs and mRNAs, mean ± SD (E). lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; mRNA, messenger RNA; miRNA, microRNA; ORF, open reading frames; SD, standard deviation
Figure 6
Figure 6
Interaction protein–protein network analysis of differentially expressed genes
Figure 7
Figure 7
Enriched GO terms (A) and KEGG pathways (B) of differentially expressed lncRNA‐related transcripts. The rich factor is the ratio of the number of different genes to the total number of genes in the database; a higher rich factor value indicates a greater enrichment degree. GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Figure 8
Figure 8
Coexpression network analyses of top five most differentially expressed transcripts (A). Enriched GO terms (B) and KEGG pathways (C) of differentially expressed lncRNAs coexpressed transcripts. GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA
Figure 9
Figure 9
LncRNA–miRNA–mRNA regulatory interaction network analysis of top 10 most differentially expressed lncRNAs. lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; mRNA, messenger RNA; miRNA, microRNA

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Galea MP. Spinal Cord Injury Physical Activity (SCIPA) Hands On Trial Collaborators . Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one‐to‐one hand therapy in people with sub‐acute spinal cord injury ('Hands On'): a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017;63(4):197‐204. - PubMed
    1. Tran AP, Warren PM, Silver J. The biology of regeneration failure and success after spinal cord injury. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(2):881‐917. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hara M, Kobayakawa K, Ohkawa Y, et al. Interaction of reactive astrocytes with type I collagen induces astrocytic scar formation through the integrin‐N‐cadherin pathway after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2017;23(7):818‐828. - PubMed
    1. Cristante AF, Barros Filho TE, Marcon RM, Letaif OB, Rocha ID. Therapeutic approaches for spinal cord injury. Clinics. 2012;67(10):1219‐1224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmes D. Spinal‐cord injury: spurring regrowth. Nature. 2017;552(7684):S49. - PubMed

Publication types