Quantification of central fatigue: a central debate
- PMID: 33991239
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04713-5
Quantification of central fatigue: a central debate
Comment on
-
On the reliability and validity of central fatigue determination.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Sep;121(9):2393-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04700-w. Epub 2021 May 8. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021. PMID: 33966110 Review.
References
-
- Brownstein CG, Millet GY, Thomas K (2021) Neuromuscular responses to fatiguing locomotor exercise. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 231(2):e13533. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13533 - DOI
-
- Cheng AJ, Dalton BH, Harwood B, Power GA (2013) “SIT” down and relax: the interpolated twitch technique is still a valid measure of central fatigue during sustained contraction tasks. J Physiol 591(15):3677–3678. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.258566 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Contessa P, Puleo A, De Luca CJ (2016) Is the notion of central fatigue based on a solid foundation? J Neurophysiol 115(2):967–977. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00889.2015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Haan A, Gerrits KH, de Ruiter CJ (2009) Counterpoint: the interpolated twitch does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. J Appl Physiol 107(1):355–357. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91220.2008a - DOI - PubMed
-
- Del Vecchio A, Casolo A, Negro F, Scorcelletti M, Bazzucchi I, Enoka R, Felici F, Farina D (2019) The increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is mediated by adaptations in motor unit recruitment and rate coding. J Physiol 597(7):1873–1887. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277250 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
