Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;24(4):1044-1055.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13266. Epub 2021 May 15.

Adolescent and young adult patients as co-researchers: A scoping review

Kjersti J Ø Fløtten  1   2 , Ana Isabel Fernandes Guerreiro  2   3 , Ilaria Simonelli  2   4 , Anne Lee Solevåg  5   6 , Isabelle Aujoulat  2   7
Affiliations

Adolescent and young adult patients as co-researchers: A scoping review

Kjersti J Ø Fløtten et al. Health Expect. 2021 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):940. doi: 10.1111/hex.13695. Epub 2022 Dec 26. Health Expect. 2023. PMID: 36571270 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: As part of a research project aimed at evaluating a hospital-based adolescent transition programme, we asked ourselves what is known about the ethical and methodological challenges of research involving adolescent patients as co-researchers. The aim of our review was to summarize empirical evidence and identify knowledge gaps about the involvement of young patients as co-researchers.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review through searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, AMED.

Results: We found reports of young patients being actively engaged as co-researchers in any stage of a research project, although commonly they were not involved in every stage. Including young patients as co-researchers is resource demanding and time-consuming. Involving young patients as co-researchers contributes to the fulfilment of their right to participation and may improve the relevance of research. Benefits for the young co-researcher include empowerment, skills building and raised self-esteem. Few authors go into detail about ethical considerations when involving young co-researchers. None of the included articles discuss legal considerations.

Discussion and conclusion: No lists of recommendations are given, but recommendations can be deduced from the articles. There is need for time, funding and flexibility when including young patients as co-researchers. Knowledge gaps concern legal and ethical dilemmas of including a vulnerable group as co-researchers. More reflection is needed about what meaningful participation is and what it entails in this context.

Patient or public contribution: This review is part of a research project where the hospital youth council has been involved in discussions of focus area and methods.

Keywords: adolescent patients; co-research; health services; participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of review process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann. 1969;35(4):216‐224.
    1. Abma TA, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GA. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(3):401‐415. - PubMed
    1. de Wit MP, Kvien TK, Gossec L. Patient participation as an integral part of patient‐reported outcomes development ensures the representation of the patient voice: a case study from the field of rheumatology. RMD Open. 2015;1(1):e000129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health Research . INVOLVE. 2019; https://www.invo.org.uk/. Accessed December 18, 2019.
    1. Helse Vest , Helse Midt‐Norge , Helse Nord , Helse Sør‐Øst . Veileder for brukermedvirkning i helseforkning i spesialisthelsetjenesten. Helse Vest, Helse Midt‐Norge, Helse Nord, Helse Sør‐Øst; 2018.

Publication types