Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan-Feb;72(1):55-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 May 12.

Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial

Aysun Ozdemirkan  1 , Ozkan Onal  2 , Irem Gumus Ozcan  1 , Emine Aslanlar  1 , Ali Saltali  1 , Mehmet Sari  1 , Cansu Ciftci  1 , Hasan Huseyin Bayram  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial

Aysun Ozdemirkan et al. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: Several devices and algorithms have already been examined and compared for difficult airway management. However, there is no existing study comparing the success of the Intubating Catheter (IC) and the Videolaryngoscope (VL) in patients who are difficult to intubate. We aimed to compare Frova IC and McGrath VL in terms of intubation success rates in patients with difficult intubation.

Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed in an university hospital. Patients who underwent an operation under general anesthesia and whom airway management process was deemed difficult were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by envelopes containing a number: the intubating catheter group (Group IC), intubated using the Frova IC, and the videolaryngoscope group (Group VL), intubated using the McGrath VL. Study data were collected by a technician who was blind to the study groups and the type of device used in the intubation procedure.

Results: A total of 49 patients with difficult airway were included in the study, including 25 patients in the Frova IC Group and 24 patients in the McGrath VL Group. The rate of successful intubation was determined to be 88% in Group IC and 66% in Group VL (p = 0.074). The mean duration of intubation attempt in Group VL was 44.62 seconds, whereas in Group IC, it was 51.12 seconds (p = 0.593). Group VL was found to have a significantly lower Cormack-Lehane grade compared to Group IC (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Frova IC is a candidate to be an indispensable instrument in terms of cost-effectiveness in clinics such as anesthesia and emergency medicine, where difficult intubation cases are frequently encountered. However, the combination of Frova IC and McGrath VL seems to be more successful in difficult intubation situations, so future studies should focus on using these two devices together.

Keywords: Airway management; Catheters; Equipment and supplies; Intratracheal; Intubation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asai T. Videolaryngoscopes: do they truly have roles in difficult airways? Anesthesiology. 2012;116:515–517. - PubMed
    1. Zaouter C., Calderon J., Hemmerling T.M. Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:181–183. - PubMed
    1. Cormack R.S., Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:1105–1111. - PubMed
    1. Taylor A.M., Peck M., Launcelott S., et al. The McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:142–147. - PubMed
    1. Shippey B., Ray D., McKeown D. Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:116–119. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources