Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 1;35(11):573-583.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002080.

Very Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: Replacement Versus Fixation: A Systematic Review

Luc Rubinger  1 , Hassaan Abdel Khalik  2 , Aaron Gazendam  1 , Jesse Wolfstadt  3 , Amir Khoshbin  4 , Daniel Tushinski  1 , Herman Johal  1
Affiliations

Very Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: Replacement Versus Fixation: A Systematic Review

Luc Rubinger et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Objectives: To synthesize all-cause reoperations and complications data as well as secondary clinical and functional outcomes, after the management of very distal femur periprosthetic fractures (vDFPFs) in a geriatric patient population with either a distal femoral locking plate (DFLP) or distal femoral replacement (DFR).

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English language articles from inception to March 16, 2020, in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines.

Study selection: Studies reporting the management of vDFPFs in adults older than 65 years with either a DFLP or DFR were included. To ensure this review solely focused on very distal femoral periprosthetic fractures, only fractures of the following classifications were included: (1) Lewis and Rorabeck type II or III, (2) Su and Associates' Classification of Supracondylar Fractures of the Distal Femur type III, (3) Backstein et al type F2, and/or (4) Kim et al type II or III.

Data extraction: Three reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. Study validity was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS), a quality assessment tool for nonrandomized controlled studies in surgery.

Data synthesis: Twenty-five studies with 649 vDFPFs were included for analysis. There were 440 knees in the DFLP group (mean age range: 65.9-88.3 years) and 209 knees in the DFR group (mean age range: 71.0-84.8 years). Because of the literature's heterogeneity, the data were qualitatively synthesized.

Conclusions: vDFPFs in the elderly treated with DFR underwent fewer reoperations relative to DFLP (0%-45% vs. 0%-77%, respectively). Time to weight-bearing was observably shorter in DFR studies relative to DFLP studies. Functional outcomes and postoperative range of motion indicated a trend for DFLP knees to outperform DFR knees. Future research should include prospective studies and cost-effectiveness evaluations to better understand the utility of DFR for these fractures.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Benkovich V, Klassov Y, Mazilis B, et al. Periprosthetic fractures of the knee: a comprehensive review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30:387–399.
    1. Platzer P, Schuster R, Aldrian S, et al. Management and outcome of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2010;68:1464–1470.
    1. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:267–276.
    1. Merkel KD, Johnson EW. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:29–43.
    1. Agarwal S, Sharma RK, Jain JK. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 2014;22:24–29.

Publication types