Evaluation of the orthopaedic trauma association open fracture classification (OTA-OFC) as an outcome prediction tool in open tibial shaft fractures
- PMID: 33993360
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03954-5
Evaluation of the orthopaedic trauma association open fracture classification (OTA-OFC) as an outcome prediction tool in open tibial shaft fractures
Abstract
Introduction: It was the goal of this study to determine if the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Open Fracture Classification (OTA-OFC) correlates with complication rates and to determine if it can be used as a predictive tool in the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures.
Materials and methods: Retrospective review from two high-volume level 1 trauma centers of open tibial shaft fractures over a 5 year period. Variables of interest included OTA-OFC, type of wound closure, 90-day wound complication, unplanned re-operation, non-union, and amputation.
Results: 501 consecutive open tibial shaft fractures. 57.3% (n = 287) were closed primarily; local soft tissue advancement/rotational flap was used in 9.6% (n = 48); free soft tissue transfer used in 22.8% (n = 114); 8.6% (n = 43) required amputation. Of those followed for 90 days (n = 419), 45 (9.0%) had a wound complication, of which 40 (8%) required an unplanned reoperation. 40 (8.0%) patients went on to a documented non-union. All OTA-OFC classification groups significantly correlated with type of definitive closure (r = 0.18-0.81, p < 0.05) with OTA-OFC skin showing the strongest correlation (r = 0.81). OTA-OFC bone loss weakly correlated with wound complication (r = 0.12, p = 0.02) and no OTA-OFC classification correlated with the need for an unplanned secondary procedure. OTA-OFC skin, muscle and arterial all weakly correlated with non-union (r = 0.18-0.25, p < 0.05). OTA-OFC muscle was predictive of non-union (OR = OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2-4.1) and amputation (OR 9.3, 95% CI = 3.7-23.7). OTA-OFC arterial was also predictive of amputation (OR 4.8, 95% CI = 2.5-9.3).
Conclusions: The OTA-OFC correlates variably with the type of definitive closure, the development of a 90-day wound complication, and the occurrence of a non-union. Importantly, OTA-OFC muscle classification is predictive of non-union while both OTA-OFC muscle and arterial were predictive of amputation.
Keywords: 90-day wound complication; Open fracture classification; Open tibia fracture.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Clinical Correlation of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Open Fracture Classification With Wound Closure and Soft-Tissue Complications in Open Upper Extremity Fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jun 1;35(6):e184-e188. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001986. J Orthop Trauma. 2021. PMID: 33079834
-
Does the OTA Open Fracture Classification Align With the Gustilo-Anderson Classification? A Study of 2215 Open Fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Feb 1;38(2):65-71. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002731. J Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 38031292 Free PMC article.
-
Is the Orthopaedic Trauma Association-Open Fracture Classification Better Than the Gustilo-Anderson Classification at Predicting Fracture-Related Infections in the Tibia?J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Dec 1;38(12):655-660. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002907. J Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39207769
-
Outcomes and complications following flexible intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial fractures in children: a meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul;142(7):1469-1482. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03839-7. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022. PMID: 33635402 Review.
-
Definitive Taylor Spatial Frame management for the treatment of high-energy open tibial fractures: Clinical and patient-reported outcomes.Injury. 2022 Dec;53(12):4104-4113. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.10.019. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Injury. 2022. PMID: 36424690 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparative Study of Taylor Spatial Frame and Monolateral External Fixator for Treating Infected Tibial Defects With Concomitant Soft Tissue Loss.Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):1985-1994. doi: 10.1111/os.70067. Epub 2025 May 15. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 40371803 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting the OTA-OFC: a systematic review of open fracture classification studies since 2010.OTA Int. 2025 Apr 10;8(2):e391. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000391. eCollection 2025 Jun. OTA Int. 2025. PMID: 40212946 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of open tibia fractures: the rationale for a new classification system.OTA Int. 2024 Jun 5;7(4 Suppl):e318. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000318. eCollection 2024 Jun. OTA Int. 2024. PMID: 38840710 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bone LB, Kassman S, Stegemann P, France J (1994) Prospective study of union rate of open tibial fractures treated with locked, unreamed intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 8(1):45–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199402000-00010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Khatod M, Botte MJ, Hoyt DB, Meyer RS, Smith JM, Akeson WH (2003) Outcomes in open tibia fractures: relationship between delay in treatment and infection. J Trauma 55(5):949–954. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000092685.80435.63 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harley BJ, Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Dulai SK, Weber DW (2002) The effect of time to definitive treatment on the rate of nonunion and infection in open fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16(7):484–490. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200208000-00006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fong K, Truong V, Foote CJ, Petrisor B, Williams D, Ristevski B, Sprague S, Bhandari M (2013) Predictors of nonunion and reoperation in patients with fractures of the tibia: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-103 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Enninghorst N, McDougall D, Hunt JJ, Balogh ZJ (2011) Open tibia fractures: timely debridement leaves injury severity as the only determinant of poor outcome. J Trauma 70(2):352–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820b4285 (discussion 6–7) - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical