Evaluating Neonatal Telehealth Programs Using the STEM Framework
- PMID: 33994012
- PMCID: PMC8693890
- DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151429
Evaluating Neonatal Telehealth Programs Using the STEM Framework
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an explosive adoption of telehealth in pediatrics . However, there remains substantial variation in evaluation methods and measures of these programs despite introduction of measurement frameworks in the last five years. In addition, for neonatal health care, assessing a telehealth program must measure its benefits and costs for four stakeholder groups - patients, providers, healthcare system, and payers. Because of differences in their role within the health system, each group's calculation of telehealth's value may align or not with one another, depending on how it is being used. Therefore, a common mental model for determining value is critical in order to use telehealth in ways that produce win-win situations for most if not all four stakeholder groups. In this chapter, we present important principles and concepts from previously published frameworks to propose an approach to telehealth evaluation that can be used for perinatal health. Such a framework will then drive future development and implementation of telehealth programs to provide value for all relevant stakeholders in a perinatal health care system.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- National Quality Forum . National Quality Forum; 2017. Creating a Framework to Support Measure Development for Telehealth.https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2017/08/Creating_a_Framework_t... Published Aug. Accessed March 2020.
-
- World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2016. Monitoring and Evaluating Digital Health interventions: A Practical Guide to Conducting Research and Assessment. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
-
- de la Torre-Díez I., López-Coronado M., Vaca C., Aguado J.S., de Castro C. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health Off Journal Am Telemed Assoc. 2015;21(2):81–85. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Totten A.M., Womack D.M., Eden K.B., et al. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD: June 2016. Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes from Systematic Reviews. Technical Brief No. 26. (Prepared By the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I.) AHRQ Publication No.16-EHC034-EF. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
