Analysis of Complications for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole Surgery Performed by Vitreoretinal Fellows and Consultants
- PMID: 33994777
- PMCID: PMC8114358
- DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S308114
Analysis of Complications for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole Surgery Performed by Vitreoretinal Fellows and Consultants
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the intraoperative and postoperative complications of vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH) performed by retinal fellows under direct faculty supervision compared with experienced faculty members.
Patients and methods: A total of 271 eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for MH and ERM from January 2014 to December 2019 at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital were analyzed. PPV for ERM and MH was performed by vitreoretinal fellows and consultants.
Results: The outcome measures assessed were the intraoperative complications rates, such as posterior lens touch, retinal breaks (RBs), retinal detachments, and vitreous hemorrhage. Moreover, the postoperative complications and optical coherence tomography (OCT) changes were assessed upon a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The rate of iatrogenic RB was more common in the ERM than in the MH surgery (15.5% vs 11.2%). Fellows and consultants had a rate of 20.5% of RB during the ERM surgery and 14.6% during MH surgery, respectively. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.12 for MH and p = 0.236 for ERM). Postoperative OCT analysis revealed an MH closure rate of 72.2%, and complete removal of the ERM was achieved in 88.6% in cases performed by fellows, while consultants achieved 61.8% closure rate of MH, and 83.3% of the patients achieved complete removal of ERM.
Conclusion: Macular surgery is overall a safe procedure and the complication rates between fellows and consultants are comparable. With proper supervision, vitreoretinal fellows can achieve equally high anatomical outcomes with few complications.
Keywords: epiretinal membrane; fellows; macular hole; pars plana vitrectomy; retinal break.
© 2021 Aljohani et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no proprietary, commercial, or non-commercial interest in any materials mentioned in this article. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN PHACOVITRECTOMY FOR EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE AND MACULAR HOLE: A Clinical Audit of 1,000 Consecutive Eyes.Retina. 2018 Sep;38(9):1865-1872. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002034. Retina. 2018. PMID: 29324594
-
Early Vascular and Functional Changes after Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Comparison between the Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 3;11(6):1031. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061031. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34205224 Free PMC article.
-
Autologous Retinal Transplantation for Primary and Refractory Macular Holes and Macular Hole Retinal Detachments: The Global Consortium.Ophthalmology. 2021 May;128(5):672-685. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 10. Ophthalmology. 2021. PMID: 33045315
-
Anatomical and visual outcomes in high myopic macular hole (HM-MH) without retinal detachment: a review.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;252(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2555-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24384802 Review.
-
Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes and Macular Holes in Uveitis Patients.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 May;33(4):298-303. doi: 10.1089/jop.2016.0142. Epub 2017 Jan 23. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017. PMID: 28112568 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous