Innovative Medical Technology and the Treatment Decision-Making Process in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus Group Study to Examine Patient Perspectives
- PMID: 33994779
- PMCID: PMC8114356
- DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S306132
Innovative Medical Technology and the Treatment Decision-Making Process in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus Group Study to Examine Patient Perspectives
Abstract
Background: Disease-modifying therapies are given to people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to reduce disease progression and relapse frequency. Current modes of administration include oral, injectable and infusion therapy and the treatment decision-making process is complex. A novel mode of treatment administration, an implantable device, is currently under development, yet patient attitudes about the device are unknown. The aim of this study was 1) to understand the treatment decision-making process from the patient perspective and 2) to explore the possible acceptance of an implant to treat MS.
Methods: Focus groups with people with MS were conducted in the Netherlands. Three topics were addressed: the treatment decision-making process, the current treatment landscape, and attitudes about the implantable device. All focus groups were recorded and transcribed and data were analyzed by raw data coding and creating themes. An online survey was conducted in the Netherlands to quantify interest in an implant.
Results: Two focus group sessions were held (n=16 participants) and n=93 persons filled out the survey. The main theme that emerged was the constant uncertainty persons with MS face throughout their disease course and during treatment decisions (when to start, stop, continue or switch treatment). Patients were generally positive towards the implant but felt that efficacy and safety should be guaranteed.
Conclusion: People with MS want some form of control over their disease and treatment course. New medical technologies, such as an implant, may enhance the treatment landscape and with caution we postulate that it may be accepted by patients as a new mode of administration, though further research is needed. For medical technologies to be successful, patients should be engaged early on in the design process.
Keywords: decision-making process; medical technology; multiple sclerosis; patient perspective.
© 2021 Visser et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr W K Redekop report grants from European Union, during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
An implantable device to treat multiple sclerosis: A discrete choice experiment on patient preferences in three European countries.J Neurol Sci. 2021 Sep 15;428:117587. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117587. Epub 2021 Jul 24. J Neurol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34364148
-
Patient decision aid based on multi-criteria decision analysis for disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis: prototype development.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01479-w. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021. PMID: 33836742 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding treatment decisions from the perspective of people with relapsing remitting multiple Sclerosis: A critical interpretive synthesis.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 17. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019. PMID: 30476873 Review.
-
Patient autonomy in multiple sclerosis--possible goals and assessment strategies.J Neurol Sci. 2013 Aug 15;331(1-2):2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 May 25. J Neurol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23711752 Review.
References
-
- The European Multiple Sclerosis Platform. MS facts. MS Facts. Available from: http://www.emsp.org/about-ms/. Accessed April29, 2021.
-
- The Optogenerapy Consortium. Optogenerapy. Available from: https://optogenerapy.eu/about-optogenerapy/. Accessed April29, 2021.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources