Perceptions and Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Among Floridian Middle and High School Students: Secondary Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Results
- PMID: 33994818
- PMCID: PMC8079930
- DOI: 10.1177/1179173X20953402
Perceptions and Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Among Floridian Middle and High School Students: Secondary Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Results
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid increase in youth use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) led the state and the federal governments to implement minimum-age policies to restrict minors' access to vaping products. Limited success of the age restrictions fueled efforts to increase the distribution age of all tobacco products to 21 (ie, Tobacco 21 or T21 policies). With limited data on the T21 policies, the current study examines the prevalence of ENDS use and the perceptions about ENDS among youth in the pre- and post-policy-implementation periods for one of these bans in the state of Florida.
Methods: This study conducted secondary analysis on the responses from the 2014 and 2015 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, which collected cross-sectional data.
Results: Compared to the data from spring of 2014, the minimum-age policy enacted on July 1, 2014 did not lead to a significant decrease in Florida's high school and middle school students' ever ENDS use (14.9% in 2014 vs 25.8% in 2015) and current ENDS use (7.5% in 2014 vs 12.4% in 2015). There was some ambiguity among students regarding the ENDS harm-more students in 2015 thought of ENDS as both equally (11.0% vs 7.7%) and less (32.4% vs 28%) harmful than cigarettes. There was a decrease in the proportion of students who were unsure about their answer to this question (51.5% vs 59.2%).
Conclusions: Policy change alone may not be effective in shifting the trend of ENDS use among middle and high school students. Although students may know about some of the ENDS effects, many of them are still not aware about the harms. Interventions in school and in the community should be aiming to raise this awareness.
Keywords: Electronic nicotine delivery systems; electronic cigarettes; policy; prevalence; youth.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Examining electronic nicotine delivery system use and perception of use among college students with and without asthma across the South.J Am Coll Health. 2022 Oct;70(7):2026-2032. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1842414. Epub 2020 Nov 5. J Am Coll Health. 2022. PMID: 33151831 Review.
-
Associations between tobacco 21 and state flavour restrictions with young adult tobacco use.Tob Control. 2024 Jul 2:tc-2023-058448. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058448. Online ahead of print. Tob Control. 2024. PMID: 38527790
-
Research support for effective state and community tobacco control programme response to electronic nicotine delivery systems.Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii54-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051460. Tob Control. 2014. PMID: 24935899 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal transitions of cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems among adolescents: Construction of a retrospective cohort using recall data from a cross-sectional sample.Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Nov 5;18:92. doi: 10.18332/tid/128488. eCollection 2020. Tob Induc Dis. 2020. PMID: 33192224 Free PMC article.
-
Public Health Policies on E-Cigarettes.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 28;21(10):111. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1204-y. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31463564 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic review for the impacts of global approaches to regulating electronic nicotine products.J Glob Health. 2023 Aug 25;13:04076. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04076. J Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37622721 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources