Efficacy of clotrimazole for the management of oral candidiasis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
- PMID: 33994826
- PMCID: PMC8093540
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.03.003
Efficacy of clotrimazole for the management of oral candidiasis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of topical application of clotrimazole versus others in the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC).
Method: Four electronic databases, registries of ongoing trials, and manual search were used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of clotrimazole to other antifungal agents in patients who were clinically diagnosed with oral candidiasis up to November 1st, 2019. Primary outcomes were clinical response and mycological cure rates. Secondary outcomes include relapse rate, incidence of systemic infections, and compliance. Adverse effects were also evaluated.
Results: Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1685 patients were included. Half of the eligible studies were considered at high risk of performance bias and more than a third, at high risk of reporting bias. Our analysis showed no significant difference in clinical response between clotrimazole and all other antifungal agents. However, clotrimazole was less effective in terms of mycologic cure and relapse rate. Sensitivity analysis comparing clotrimazole to other topical antifungal agents only showed no differences in clinical response, microbiologic cure or relapse. Further sensitivity analysis showed significant efficacy of fluconazole over clotrimazole.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicated that clotrimazole is less effective than fluconazole but as effective as other topical therapies in treating OPC. Well-designed high-quality RCT is needed to validate these findings.
Keywords: CI, confidence interval; Clotrimazole; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; Meta-analysis; OPC, oropharyngeal candidiasis; OR, odds ratio; Oral candidiasis; Systematic review.
© 2021 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Cutaneous candidiasis - an evidence-based review of topical and systemic treatments to inform clinical practice.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Oct;33(10):1863-1873. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15782. Epub 2019 Jul 30. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019. PMID: 31287594 Review.
-
Comparative study of fluconazole and clotrimazole for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Jul-Aug;22(4):228-30. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199507000-00005. Sex Transm Dis. 1995. PMID: 7482105 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative Efficacy of Antifungal Agents Used in the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis among HIV-Infected Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Aug 5;7(8):637. doi: 10.3390/jof7080637. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34436176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emergence of resistance of Candida albicans to clotrimazole in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children: in vitro and clinical correlations.J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Apr;38(4):1563-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.4.1563-1568.2000. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. PMID: 10747144 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology of oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: colonization, infection, treatment, and emergence of fluconazole resistance.Am J Med. 1994 Oct;97(4):339-46. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90300-x. Am J Med. 1994. PMID: 7942935 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Conrad D.A., Lentnek A.L. Comparitive evaluation on nystatin pastille and clotrimazole troche for the treatment of candidal stomatitis in immunocompromised patients. Curr. Therap. Res. – Clin. Exp. 1990;47(4):627–636.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources