Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Apr 30;12(2):e9-e10.
doi: 10.36834/cmej.72364. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Reused Reviews: the CMEJ announces a new policy to recycle peer reviews

Affiliations
Editorial

Reused Reviews: the CMEJ announces a new policy to recycle peer reviews

Jennifer M O'Brien et al. Can Med Educ J. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snell L, Spencer J. Reviewers’ perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):90-97. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black N, Van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280(3):231-233. 10.1001/jama.280.3.231 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yankauer A. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review? JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990;263(10):1338-1340. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100042005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Eon MF. Peer review: my article was rejected by the journal I edit. Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(4):e1-e4. 10.36834/cmej.70700 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maggio LA, Driessen EW, Driessen EW. Editorial Perspectives on Medical Education: three changes in our guidelines to make authors’ and reviewers’ lives easier. Perspect Med Educ. 10.1007/s40037-020-00563-7 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources