Reused Reviews: the CMEJ announces a new policy to recycle peer reviews

Jennifer M O'Brien^{1

2}, Brent Thoma^{1

3}

Affiliations

¹ Canadian Medical Education Journal.
² Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
³ Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Editorial

Jennifer M O'Brien et al. Can Med Educ J. 2021.

. 2021 Apr 30;12(2):e9-e10.

doi: 10.36834/cmej.72364. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Jennifer M O'Brien^{1

2}, Brent Thoma^{1

3}

¹ Canadian Medical Education Journal.
² Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
³ Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.

No abstract available

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

1. Snell L, Spencer J. Reviewers’ perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):90-97. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x - DOI - PubMed
1. Black N, Van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280(3):231-233. 10.1001/jama.280.3.231 - DOI - PubMed
1. Yankauer A. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review? JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990;263(10):1338-1340. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100042005 - DOI - PubMed
1. D’Eon MF. Peer review: my article was rejected by the journal I edit. Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(4):e1-e4. 10.36834/cmej.70700 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Maggio LA, Driessen EW, Driessen EW. Editorial Perspectives on Medical Education: three changes in our guidelines to make authors’ and reviewers’ lives easier. Perspect Med Educ. 10.1007/s40037-020-00563-7 - DOI