Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 15;12(5):578-589.
doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.578.

Chronic care model in the diabetes pay-for-performance program in Taiwan: Benefits, challenges and future directions

Affiliations
Review

Chronic care model in the diabetes pay-for-performance program in Taiwan: Benefits, challenges and future directions

Tsung-Tai Chen et al. World J Diabetes. .

Abstract

In this review, we discuss the chronic care model (CCM) in relation to the diabetes pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan. We first introduce the 6 components of the CCM and provide a detailed description of each of the activities in the P4P program implemented in Taiwan, mapping them onto the 6 components of the CCM. For each CCM component, the following three topics are described: the definition of the CCM component, the general activities implemented related to this component, and practical and empirical practices based on hospital or local government cases. We then conclude by describing the possible successful features of this P4P program and its challenges and future directions. We conclude that the successful characteristics of this P4P program in Taiwan include its focus on extrinsic and intrinsic incentives (i.e., shared care network), physician-led P4P and the implementation of activities based on the CCM components. However, due to the low rate of P4P program coverage, approximately 50% of patients with diabetes cannot enjoy the benefits of CCM-related activities or receive necessary examinations. In addition, most of these CCM-related activities are not allotted an adequate amount of incentives, and these activities are mainly implemented in hospitals, which compared with primary care providers, are unable to execute these activities flexibly. All of these issues, as well as insufficient implementation of the e-CCM model, could hinder the advanced improvement of diabetes care in Taiwan.

Keywords: Chronic care model; Diabetes; Diabetes care; Pay-for-performance; Shared care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no financial relationships to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The framework of driving other chronic care model components from system components in Taiwan. P4P: Pay-for-performance; CIS: Clinical information system; DSS: Decision support system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iezzi E, Lippi Bruni M, Ugolini C. The role of GP's compensation schemes in diabetes care: evidence from panel data. J Health Econ. 2014;34:104–120. - PubMed
    1. Ryan AM, Doran T. The effect of improving processes of care on patient outcomes: evidence from the United Kingdom's quality and outcomes framework. Med Care. 2012;50:191–199. - PubMed
    1. Tompkins CP, Higgins AR, Ritter GA. Measuring outcomes and efficiency in medicare value-based purchasing. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:w251–w261. - PubMed
    1. Girault A, Bellanger M, Lalloué B, Loirat P, Moisdon JC, Minvielle E. Implementing hospital pay-for-performance: Lessons learned from the French pilot program. Health Policy. 2017;121:407–417. - PubMed
    1. Yang JH, Kim SM, Han SJ, Knaak M, Yang GH, Lee KD, Yoo YH, Ha G, Kim EJ, Yoo MS. The impact of Value Incentive Program (VIP) on the quality of hospital care for acute stroke in Korea. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28:580–585. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources