Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 25;55(3):560-570.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00291-4. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Research Update on Stress Riser Fractures

Affiliations
Review

Research Update on Stress Riser Fractures

Jehyun Yoo et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Stress fractures are fatigue-induced fractures which are caused by repetitive force, often from overuse. They are well-established and frequently encountered in the field of orthopedics. Stress fractures occur in the bone because of low-bone strength and high chronic mechanical stress placed on the bone. Stress riser fractures are also stress fractures that occur because of the presence of cortical defects (holes), changes in stiffness, sharp corners, and cracks (fracture lines). Periprosthetic or peri-implant fractures are good examples of stress riser fractures that occur in regions where stress forces are higher than those in the surrounding material. Most stress riser fractures are related to technical errors (iatrogenic causes) and are difficult to manage. It is possible and more effective to prevent the creation of stress riser fractures through better surgical techniques. The proper terminology for stress fractures, stress riser fractures, periprosthetic fractures, peri-implant fractures, interprosthetic fractures, and interimplant fractures is discussed. This review of the current state of knowledge, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of stress riser fractures is based on clinical evidence and recent literature.

Keywords: Interimplant fracture; Interprosthetic fracture; Peri-implant fracture; Periprosthetic fracture; Stress fracture; Stress riser fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A sketch map and real photos show the factors that lead to stress riser fractures. The crack from the hole is a good example of stress riser fractures, and the crack is propagated from the sharp corner
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An empty guide pin (2.8 mm) hole was left in the subtrochanteric area during femoral neck fracture fixation with cannulated screws. The secondary subtrochanteric fracture occurred in the stress riser of the empty hole
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk factors in stress riser fractures as a change of stiffness (“Young’s modulus” fracture). a The upper most bicortical locking head screw had a role in stress concentration; b A dual plate at same level can make a stress concentration
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The authors performed an arthroplasty due to hip pain in a 74-year-old female patient with Paget’s disease. The hairline crack (arrow) became progressively worse every month. A stress riser fracture occurred in the subtrochanteric area 6 months after the operation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a An 81-year old woman was fixed with two cannulated screws. b A bone scan was useful to detect the impending stress riser fracture. c The stress riser fracture occurred from the screw hole. d We reduced the fracture gap by the proximal femoral nail
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Empty screw holes were left just around the tip of the stem. It can be a risk factor for periprosthetic stress riser fractures
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
a An 87-year-old female patient who had a distal ipsilateral femoral fracture from a previous operation using an intramedullary nail for a trochanteric fracture; b the operation with a locking compression plate was conducted; c The patient suffered a fracture between the old nail and the new plate only 1 week after the operation; d the removal of the previous hip nail was performed and a Huckstep nail was inserted

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tins BJ, Garton M, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Tyrrell PN, Lalam R, Singh J. Stress fracture of the pelvis and lower limbs including atypical femoral fractures—a review. Insights into imaging. 2015;6:97–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laurence M, Freeman MAR, Swanson SAV. Engineering considerations in the internal fixation of fractures of the tibial shaft. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 1969;51(4):754–768. - PubMed
    1. Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, Hastings DE, Fornasier VL. Iatrogenic subcapital fracture of the hip: A new complication of intertrochanteric fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1975;112:218–220. - PubMed
    1. Kim HK, Noh KC, Chung KJ, Hwang JH. Use of Huckstep nail in the periimplant femoral shaft fracture. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2012;46:718–720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan LWM, Gardner AW, Wong MK, Chua K, Kwek EBK. Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures: Classification, management and outcomes. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2018;138:791–802. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources