Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 25:9:20503121211012512.
doi: 10.1177/20503121211012512. eCollection 2021.

Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review

Firomsa Bekele et al. SAGE Open Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: The mental health of the health care professionals is more likely to be affected by the coronavirus disease-19 compared to the general population. Accordingly, the current study aimed to summarize the magnitudes and determinants of the psychological impact of coronavirus among health care professionals.

Methods: The studies from Medline via PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched from 5 September to 19 October 2020. The review was conducted as per PRISMA-2009 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses).

Result: Initially, 6316 articles were searched from three databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). Finally, 20 articles were filtered to be included in our review. Among different types of psychological impact, stress was reported that lies within the range from 5.2% to 100%, anxiety was reported from 11.1% to 100%, depression was from 10.6% to 58%, and insomnia was from 28.75% to 34%. Several factors were related to the negative psychological state of health care workers due to coronavirus disease-19 like educational level, occupation, gender, age, working environment, work experience, legal status, ethnicity, psychological comorbidity, social support, personal/family exposure, and feeling of health care providers.

Conclusion: The most common psychological impacts among health care workers were anxiety and stress. Besides different sociodemographic factors that determine the psychological impacts, front-line health care workers and participants having psychological comorbidity have a high risk of negative psychological state impacts as compared to their counterparts. Therefore, special attention should tend to health care workers directly involved in the prevention and management of coronavirus disease-19 and having a different risk of mental health condition.

Keywords: COVID-19; determinants; health care workers; magnitude; psychological impacts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the systematic research and study selection process.

References

    1. Chekole YA, Yimer Minaye S, Mekonnen Abate S, et al. Perceived stress and its associated factors during COVID-19 among healthcare providers in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Adv Publ Healt 2020; 2020: 5036861.
    1. Sheleme T, Bekele F, Ayela T. Clinical presentation of patients infected with coronavirus disease 19: a systematic review. Infect Dis 2020; 13: 952076. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schäfer S, Sopp R, Schanz C, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on public mental health and the buffering effect of sense of coherence. Psychother Psychosom 2020; 89: 386–392. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2020; 277: 55–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu X, Kakade M, Fuller CJ, et al. Depression after exposure to stressful events: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic. Compr Psychiatry 2012; 53(1): 15–23. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources