Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 29:9:673683.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.673683. eCollection 2021.

Current Status and Limitations of Myocardial Infarction Large Animal Models in Cardiovascular Translational Research

Affiliations
Review

Current Status and Limitations of Myocardial Infarction Large Animal Models in Cardiovascular Translational Research

Hye Sook Shin et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Establishing an appropriate disease model that mimics the complexities of human cardiovascular disease is critical for evaluating the clinical efficacy and translation success. The multifaceted and complex nature of human ischemic heart disease is difficult to recapitulate in animal models. This difficulty is often compounded by the methodological biases introduced in animal studies. Considerable variations across animal species, modifications made in surgical procedures, and inadequate randomization, sample size calculation, blinding, and heterogeneity of animal models used often produce preclinical cardiovascular research that looks promising but is irreproducible and not translatable. Moreover, many published papers are not transparent enough for other investigators to verify the feasibility of the studies and the therapeutics' efficacy. Unfortunately, successful translation of these innovative therapies in such a closed and biased research is difficult. This review discusses some challenges in current preclinical myocardial infarction research, focusing on the following three major inhibitors for its successful translation: Inappropriate disease model, frequent modifications to surgical procedures, and insufficient reporting transparency.

Keywords: heart failure; large animal models; large animal surgery; myocardial infarction; preclinical; review; translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Anatomy of coronary arteries of the heart (A) Left and right coronary trees; (B) Different occlusion targets (indicated in different colors) on the left coronary artery.

References

    1. Acharya D. (2020). Unloading and reperfusion in myocardial infarction. Circulation 13:1. - PubMed
    1. Alestalo K., Korpi R., Mäkelä J., Lehtonen S., Mäkelä T., Yannopoulos F., et al. (2015). High number of transplanted stem cells improves myocardial recovery after AMI in a porcine model. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 49 82–94. 10.3109/14017431.2015.1018311 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533 452–454. 10.1038/533452a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Begley C. G., Ioannidis J. P. A. (2015). Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ. Res. 116 116–126. 10.1161/circresaha.114.303819 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blair E. (1961). Anatomy of the ventricular coronary arteries in the dog. Circ. Res. 9 333–341. 10.1161/01.res.9.2.333 - DOI