Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May 1:2021:5541613.
doi: 10.1155/2021/5541613. eCollection 2021.

Improved Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer under Multidisciplinary Team: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Improved Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer under Multidisciplinary Team: A Meta-Analysis

Dong Peng et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to evaluate whether multidisciplinary team improved overall survival of colorectal cancer.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database were searched from inception to October 25, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence (CI) of overall survival (OS) were calculated.

Results: A total of 11 studies with 30814 patients were included in this meta-analysis. After pooling the HRs, the MDT group was associated with better OS compared with the non-MDT group (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94, p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis of stage IV colorectal cancer, the MDT group was associated with better OS as well (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.90, p = 0.004). However, in terms of postoperative mortality, no significant difference was found between MDT and non-MDT groups (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.44-1.61, p = 0.60).

Conclusion: MDT could improve OS of colorectal cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of MDT on overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis of MDT on overall survival of stage IV colorectal cancer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Postoperative mortality between MDT and non-MDT groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R. L., Torre L. A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rawla P., Sunkara T., Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Gastroenterology Review. 2019;14(2):89–103. doi: 10.5114/pg.2018.81072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Fedewa S. A., et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2017;67(3):177–193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leufkens A. M., van den Bosch M. A., van Leeuwen M. S., Siersema P. D. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography for colon cancer staging: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;46(7-8):887–894. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.574732. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner H., Kloor M., Pox C. P. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1490–1502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources