Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 27:9:40-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.03.018. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Conversion of Hip Arthrodesis Using Robotic Arm Technology

Affiliations

Conversion of Hip Arthrodesis Using Robotic Arm Technology

Syed Ali Adil et al. Arthroplast Today. .

Abstract

Recent advancements in computer-assisted surgery have led to a renewed interest in robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty. This technology assists with component position which is especially useful in prior trauma or dysplasia cases. We present a case of a surgical hip fusion conversion to total hip arthroplasty with the use of robotic-assisted technology. Enhanced preoperative planning with the ability to manipulate implant position before execution can be invaluable during complex procedures. Further research is warranted before revision cases using computerized navigation systems becomes more prevalent.

Keywords: Conversion; Hip arthrodesis; Revision; Robotic surgery; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AP pelvis view showing left hip fusion mass with hardware in place.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anterior view of the 3D printed model of the hip fusion mass, left hemi-pelvis, and proximal femur.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Oblique view of the 3D printed model of the hip fusion mass, left hemi-pelvis, and proximal femur.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Lateral view of the 3D printed model of the hip fusion mass, left hemi-pelvis, and proximal femur.
Figure 5
Figure 5
AP view of virtual representation of the fusion mass created using MAKO software from CT images. There is a leg length discrepancy of 49 mm and a decreased offset of 16 mm in the operative extremity.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Lateral view of virtual representation of the fusion mass created using MAKO software from CT images. There is a leg length discrepancy of 49 mm and a decreased offset of 16 mm in the operative extremity.
Figure 7
Figure 7
AP view of the pelvis displaying preoperative Templating of the fusion mass osteotomy and implant positioning using the virtual model generated by MAKO software from CT images. Yellow circles represent lesser trochanters.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Lateral view of the pelvis displaying preoperative Templating of the fusion mass osteotomy and implant positioning using the virtual model generated by MAKO software from CT images. Yellow circles represent lesser trochanters.
Figure 9
Figure 9
AP of left hip showing immediate postoperative total hip arthroplasty and takedown of fusion mass.

References

    1. Hepinstall M.S. Robotic total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45:443. - PubMed
    1. Picard F., Deakin A.H., Riches P.E., Deep K., Baines J. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: past, present and future. Med Eng Phys. 2019;72:55. - PubMed
    1. Parsley B.S. Robotics in orthopedics: a brave new world. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2355. - PubMed
    1. Jacofsky D.J., Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2353. - PubMed
    1. Banerjee S., Cherian J.J., Elmallah R.K., Pierce T.P., Jauregui J.J., Mont M.A. Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13:47. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources