Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 Apr 21:33:100474.
doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100474. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Supporting the medial hinge in proximal humerus fractures with an intramedullary plate

Affiliations
Case Reports

Supporting the medial hinge in proximal humerus fractures with an intramedullary plate

Tjibbe J Gardenbroek et al. Trauma Case Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures are common and approximately 20% of displaced fractures may benefit from surgery. A lack of medial support is found to be a predictor of failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. The optimal technique for restoring the medial hinge is unclear. We describe two cases of patients with a dislocated 4-part humerus fracture treated with a locking plate and an additional small intramedullary plate to support the medial hinge. This technique is simple and allows for an enhanced stability of the medial hinge during and after surgery.

Keywords: Intramedullary plate; Medial hinge plate; Proximal humerus fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The preoperative image of the displaced, four-part proximal humerus. Fracture of patient A (left) and patient B (right).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The peroperative image with the placement of a two-hole 2.4 mm intramedullary plate to reconstruct the medial hinge in patient A (left) and patient B (right).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Intra-operative photo of patient B showing the medial hinge plate (2.0 mm).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Postoperative images of patient A and patient B.

References

    1. Court-Brown C.M., Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37:691–697. - PubMed
    1. Bergdahl C., Ekholm C., Wennergren D., Nilsson F., Moller M. Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish Fracture Register. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016;17:159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boileau P., Pennington S.D., Alami G. Proximal humeral fractures in younger patients: fixation techniques and arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2011;20:S47–S60. - PubMed
    1. Nho S.J., Brophy R.H., Barker J.U., Cornell C.N., MacGillivray J.D. Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89(Suppl. 3):44–58. - PubMed
    1. Murray I.R., Amin A.K., White T.O., Robinson C.M. Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.) 2011;93:1–11. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources