Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 25:35:100853.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100853. eCollection 2021 May.

Dysglycemia in adults at risk for or living with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: Insights from continuous glucose monitoring

Affiliations

Dysglycemia in adults at risk for or living with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: Insights from continuous glucose monitoring

Souptik Barua et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrable benefits for people living with diabetes, but the supporting evidence is almost exclusively from White individuals with type 1 diabetes. Here, we have quantified CGM profiles in Hispanic/Latino adults with or at-risk of non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: 100 participants (79 female, 86% Hispanic/Latino [predominantly Mexican], age 54·6 [±12·0] years) stratified into (i) at risk of T2D, (ii) with pre-diabetes (pre-T2D), and (iii) with non-insulin treated T2D, wore blinded CGMs for 2 weeks. Beyond standardized CGM measures (average glucose, glucose variability, time in 70-140 mg/dL and 70-180 mg/dL ranges), we also examined additional CGM measures based on the time of day.

Findings: Standardized CGM measures were significantly different for participants with T2D compared to at-risk and pre-T2D participants (p<0·0001). In addition, pre-T2D participants spent more time between 140 and 180 mg/dL during the day than at-risk participants (p<0·01). T2D participants spent more time between 140 and 180 mg/dL both during the day and overnight compared to at-risk and pre-T2D participants (both p<0·0001). Time in 70-140 mg/dL range during the day was significantly correlated with HbA1c (r=-0·72, p<0·0001), after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and waist circumference (p<0·0001).

Interpretation: Standardized CGM measures show a progression of dysglycemia from at-risk of T2D, to pre-T2D, and to T2D. Stratifying CGM readings by time of day and the range 140-180 mg/dL provides additional metrics to differentiate between the groups.

Funding: US Department of Agriculture (Grant #2018-33800-28404) and NSF PATHS-UP ERC (Award #1648451).

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Hispanic/Latino adults; Pre-diabetes; Time in range; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DK reports non-financial support from Abbott Diabetes Care, during the conduct of the study; grants from Lilly, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from NovoNordisk, personal fees from Glooko, outside the submitted work. NG, CC, AL, and WB report non-financial support from Abbott Diabetes Care, grants from US Dept of Agriculture, during the conduct of the study; grants from Lilly, outside the submitted work. SB and AS declare no competing interest(s).

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1
CGM wear time statistics for the participant cohort (n = 100). (a) Number of days participants wore a CGM device (b) Percentage of time CGM was active during wear time.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standardized CGM measures for n = 100 participants stratified by HbA1c. Boxplots shown as median (red), interquartile range (blue edges) and total range (black tails). Outliers shown as red dots. P-values for pairwise comparisons computed using Tukey's HSD criterion (ns: not significant, *:p<0.05, ⁎⁎:p<0.01, ⁎⁎⁎:p<0.001, ⁎⁎⁎⁎:p<0.0001). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Standardized CGM measures for at-risk (blue), pre-T2D (green), and T2D (red) participants computed separately for overnight (12am-6am) and rest of the day (6am-12am). The 45 dotted line indicates equal values for overnight and rest of day; any participant below the line has a higher overnight value for that measure, whereas participants above the line have higher rest of the day values for that measure. %CV: Coefficient of variation expressed as a percentage value. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time in 140 to 180 mg/dL range stratified by group and time (overnight versus rest of day). At-risk participants denoted using blue dots, pre-T2D participants using green dots, and T2D participants using red dots. The 45 dotted line indicates equal values for overnight and rest of day time in 140 to 180 mg/dL range. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 5:
Fig. 5
Relationship between overnight and rest of the day time in 70–140 mg/dL range with HbA1c for all participants. Color bar representing HbA1c values varies from 5.0% (dark blue) to 11.0% (dark red). The 45 dotted line indicates equal values for overnight and rest of day time in 70–140 mg/dL range. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deiss D., Bolinder J., Riveline J.-.P. Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2730–2732. - PubMed
    1. Battelino T., Danne T., Bergenstal R.M. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–1603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Battelino T., Bergenstal R.M. Continuous glucose monitoring–derived data report—simply a better management tool. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:2327–2329. - PubMed
    1. Beck R.W., Bergenstal R.M., Riddlesworth T.D. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:400–405. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lind M., Polonsky W., Hirsch I.B. Continuous glucose monitoring vs conventional therapy for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: the GOLD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317:379–387. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources