Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul;42(7):1381-1392.
doi: 10.1111/risa.13757. Epub 2021 May 16.

The Social Amplification of Risk Framework: A Normative Perspective on Trust?

Angela Bearth  1 , Michael Siegrist  1
Affiliations
Review

The Social Amplification of Risk Framework: A Normative Perspective on Trust?

Angela Bearth et al. Risk Anal. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Public trust is being lamented as the central victim of our new, digital information environment, a notion that is depicted in labeling our society as "posttruth" or "posttrust." Within this article, we aim to call this deficit view of public trust into question and kindle a more positive outlook in future research. For this, we utilize the Social Amplification of Risk Framework to discuss trust as an inherent aspect of social interactions and to question the frameworks' normative approach to public trust and risk perception. Utilizing a literature review of prior studies that investigated trust within the structure of SARF and a case study on the impacts of Fukushima on public trust in nuclear energy, we would like to argue that the current normative "trust deficit model" should be overcome and future risk research should increasingly focus on the opportunities of the digital informational environment for risk communication.

Keywords: Risk communication; risk perception; social amplification of risk framework; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amend, E. , & Secko, D. M. (2012). In the face of critique: A metasynthesis of the experiences of journalists covering health and science. Science Communication, 34(2), 241–282. 10.1177/1075547011409952 - DOI
    1. American Nuclear Society . (2012). Fukushima Daiichi: ANS committee report. Retrieved from http://fukushima.ans.org/report/Fukushima_report.pdf
    1. Arlt, D. , & Wolling, J. (2016). Fukushima effects in Germany? Changes in media coverage and public opinion on nuclear power. Public Understanding of Science, 25(7), 842–857. 10.1177/0963662515589276 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bearth, A. , Kwon, S. , & Siegrist, M. (2020). Chemophobia and knowledge of toxicological principles in South‐Korea: Perceptions of trace chemicals in consumer products. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 89, 104144. 10.1080/15287394.2020.1851834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bearth, A. , Saleh, R. , & Siegrist, M. (2019). Lay‐people's knowledge about toxicology and its principles in eight European countries. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 131, 110560. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.06.007 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources