Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Sep;48(9):1250-1259.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13479. Epub 2021 Jun 20.

Comparing periodontitis biomarkers in saliva, oral rinse and gingival crevicular fluid: A pilot study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing periodontitis biomarkers in saliva, oral rinse and gingival crevicular fluid: A pilot study

Panagiota Katsiki et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To explore the feasibility of screening for periodontitis by measuring biomarkers, namely total proteolytic activity (TPA), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, chitinase, lysozyme or their combination, in saliva, oral rinse and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF).

Material and methods: Subjects were recruited among healthy/gingivitis individuals and untreated periodontitis patients in Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). All participants donated samples of unstimulated whole saliva, oral rinse and GCF. The protein concentrations and MMP-8 levels were determined by ELISA. Enzymatic activities were measured using appropriate fluorogenic substrates.

Results: In oral rinse samples, periodontitis patients (n = 19) exhibited significantly higher concentrations of MMP-8 and TPA than controls (n = 20). MMP-8 in combination with chitinase explained 88% of the variance and assigned a subject to control or periodontitis group, with best accuracy (87.2%) in oral rinse.

Conclusions: The combination of MMP-8 and chitinase in the current oral rinse procedure has the potential to discriminate periodontitis from periodontal health/gingivitis.

Keywords: MMP-8; biomarkers; chitinase; gingival crevicular fluid; modelling; oral rinse; periodontitis; principal component analysis (PCA); protease; saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this study.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Results for unstimulated saliva samples of controls and periodontitis patients; total proteolytic activity (TPA) (a), matrix metalloproteinase‐8 (MMP‐8) concentrations (b), chitinase activity (c), lysozyme activity (d) and albumin concentrations (e). Horizontal lines represent median values for each group. ***p < .001, **p ≤ .01. Presentation of MMP‐8 values in logarithmic scale
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Results for oral rinse samples of controls and periodontitis patients; Total proteolytic activity (TPA) (a), matrix metalloproteinase‐8 (MMP‐8) concentrations (b), chitinase activity (c) and lysozyme activity (d). Albumin values were below detection level. Horizontal lines represent median values for each group. ***p < .001, **p ≤ .01. Presentation of MMP‐8 values in logarithmic scale
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Results for gingival crevicular fluid samples of controls and periodontitis patients; Total proteolytic activity (TPA) (a), matrix metalloproteinase‐8 (MMP‐8) concentrations (b), chitinase activity (c), lysozyme activity (d) and albumin concentrations (e). Horizontal lines represent median values for each group. ***p < .001, **p ≤ .01, *p ≤ .05. Presentation of MMP‐8 values in logarithmic scale
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(a) Principal component analysis (PCA) plots of all oral samples (saliva, OR, GCF). Components 1 and 2 were mainly determined by matrix metalloproteinase‐8 (MMP‐8) and chitinase and explained 33% and 19% of variance, respectively. Controls and periodontitis patients differed significantly (PERMANOVA, F = 7.5, p = .0001). (b) PCA plots of oral rinse samples. Components 1 and 2 were mainly determined by matrix metalloproteinase‐8 (MMP‐8) and chitinase and explained 63% and 25% of variance, respectively. Controls and periodontitis patients differed significantly (PERMANOVA, F = 11, p = .0001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahdi, M., Teeuw, W. J., Meeuwissen, H. G., Hoekstra, J. B., Gerdes, V. E., Loos, B. G., & Meesters, E. W. (2015). Oral health information from the dentist to the diabetologist. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 26(7), 498–503. 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.06.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arias‐Bujanda, N., Regueira‐Iglesias, A., Balsa‐Castro, C., Nibali, L., Donos, N., & Tomas, I. (2019). Accuracy of single molecular biomarkers in saliva for the diagnosis of periodontitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(1), 2–18. 10.1111/jcpe.13202 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barros, S. P., Williams, R., Offenbacher, S., & Morelli, T. (2016). Gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis. Periodontology 2000, 70(1), 53–64. 10.1111/prd.12107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bikker, F. J., Nascimento, G. G., Nazmi, K., Silbereisen, A., Belibasakis, G. N., Kaman, W. E., Lopez, R., & Bostanci, N. (2019). Salivary total protease activity based on a broad‐spectrum fluorescence resonance energy transfer approach to monitor induction and resolution of gingival inflammation. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 23(5), 667–676. 10.1007/s40291-019-00421-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolerazska, B., Marekova, M., & Markovska, N. (2016). Trends in laboratory diagnostic methods in periodontology. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 59(1), 3–9. 10.14712/18059694.2016.47 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources