Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;28(4):401-413.
doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000503. Epub 2021 May 17.

Smartphone-Based Neuropsychological Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: Feasibility, Validity, and Contextually Driven Variability in Cognition

Affiliations

Smartphone-Based Neuropsychological Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: Feasibility, Validity, and Contextually Driven Variability in Cognition

Emma L Weizenbaum et al. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders demands methods of accessible assessment that reliably captures cognition in daily life contexts. We investigated the feasibility of smartphone cognitive assessment in people with Parkinson's disease (PD), who may have cognitive impairment in addition to motor-related problems that limit attending in-person clinics. We examined how daily-life factors predicted smartphone cognitive performance and examined the convergent validity of smartphone assessment with traditional neuropsychological tests.

Methods: Twenty-seven nondemented individuals with mild-moderate PD attended one in-lab session and responded to smartphone notifications over 10 days. The smartphone app queried participants 5x/day about their location, mood, alertness, exercise, and medication state and administered mobile games of working memory and executive function.

Results: Response rate to prompts was high, demonstrating feasibility of the approach. Between-subject reliability was high on both cognitive games. Within-subject variability was higher for working memory than executive function. Strong convergent validity was seen between traditional tests and smartphone working memory but not executive function, reflecting the latter's ceiling effects. Participants performed better on mobile working memory tasks when at home and after recent exercise. Less self-reported daytime sleepiness and lower PD symptom burden predicted a stronger association between later time of day and higher smartphone test performance.

Conclusions: These findings support feasibility and validity of repeat smartphone assessments of cognition and provide preliminary evidence of the effects of context on cognitive variability in PD. Further development of this accessible assessment method could increase sensitivity and specificity regarding daily cognitive dysfunction for PD and other clinical populations.

Keywords: Cognition; Ecological sampling method; Mobile phone; Parkinson’s disease; Precision medicine; Smartphone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
mindLAMP App Assessments. (a) Location & Social Context Survey: Indication of type of current location and social context. (b) Mood & Alertness Survey: five questions including rating happiness, sadness, anxiety, alertness, and level of motivation to try one’s hardest on subsequent cognitive games. (c) Backwards Spatial Span Test: four increasingly challenging trials of a task requiring one to tap the sequences of boxes that appeared on the screen during that trial but in reverse order. (d) Trails-B Test: four increasingly lengthy trials of a task requiring one to tap numbers and letters on the screen in a sequential and alternating manner.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Summary of Smartphone Survey Responses.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Examples of Between-Person Variability in the Association Between Time of Day and Smartphone Trails-B Accuracy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson M & Perrin A (2017). Technology Use among Seniors. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for Internet & Technology.
    1. Bauer RM, Iverson GL, Cernich AN, Binder LM, Ruff RM, & Naugle RI (2012). Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(2), 177–196. 10.1080/13854046.2012.663001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell-McGinty S, Podell K, Franzen M, Baird AD, & Williams MJ (2002). Standard measures of executive function in predicting instrumental activities of daily living in older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(9), 828–834. 10.1002/gps.646 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bielak AAM, Mogle J, & Sliwinski MJ (2017). What did you do today? Variability in daily activities is related to variability in daily cognitive performance. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 10.1093/geronb/gbx145 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bot BM, Suver C, Neto EC, Kellen M, Klein A, Bare C, …Trister AD(2016). The mPower study, Parkinson disease mobile data collected using ResearchKit. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160011. 10.1038/sdata.2016.11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types