Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Aug;23(8):1989-1994.
doi: 10.1111/dom.14439. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

A real-world study of user characteristics, safety and efficacy of open-source closed-loop systems and Medtronic 670G

Affiliations
Observational Study

A real-world study of user characteristics, safety and efficacy of open-source closed-loop systems and Medtronic 670G

Roshell Jeyaventhan et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

We report a real-world evaluation of the first commercially approved automated insulin delivery (AID) system, MiniMed 670G (670G), and open source-automated insulin delivery (OS-AID) systems. This was undertaken as a retrospective observational study in adults with type 1 diabetes using AID systems for 6 months or longer in a publicly funded health service using clinically validated data. Sixty-eight adults (38 670G, 30 OS-AID systems) were included. OS-AID system users were younger, had a shorter diabetes duration and a higher education status. OS-AID systems displayed a significantly better change in HbA1c (median -0.9% [-0.4%, -1.1%] vs. -0.1% [IQR -0.7%, 0.2%], P = .004) and time in range 3.9-10 mmol/L (mean 78.5%, SD ± 12.0% vs. 68.2% ± 14.7%, P = .024) compared with 670G. Both systems showed minimal hypoglycaemia, with OS-AID systems revealing significantly improved secondary outcomes of mean glucose and percentage of time more than 10 mmol/L, with a higher percentage of time of less than 3 mmol/L. OS-AID system users displayed improved glycaemic outcomes with no clinical safety concerns compared with 670G, although higher weight-adjusted insulin dose and weight gain were noted. The study highlights key differences in OS-AID system user characteristics that are important for interpreting real-world findings from recent OS-AID system studies.

Keywords: DIY artificial pancreas systems; artificial pancreas systems; automated insulin delivery systems; open source-automated insulin delivery systems; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Frier BM. The incidence and impact of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Int Diabetes Monit. 2009;21(6):210-218.
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):66-72.
    1. NHS Digital. National Diabetes Audit, 2017-2018. Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets Full Report 2019, England and Wales, 13 June 2019; 2018. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nat.... Accessed March 14, 2020.
    1. Kowalski A. Pathway to artificial pancreas systems revisited: moving downstream. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1036-1043.
    1. Jennings P, Hussain S. Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems: a review of the emerging evidence and insights for healthcare professionals. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2020;14(5):868-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932296819894296.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources