The DISCO study-Does Interventionalists' Sex impact Coronary Outcomes?
- PMID: 34000081
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29774
The DISCO study-Does Interventionalists' Sex impact Coronary Outcomes?
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the association of operator sex with appropriateness and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: Recent studies suggest that physician sex may impact outcomes for specific patient cohorts. There are no data evaluating the impact of operator sex on PCI outcomes.
Methods: We studied the impact of operator sex on PCI outcome and appropriateness among all patients undergoing PCI between January 2010 and December 2017 at 48 non-federal hospitals in Michigan. We used logistic regression models to adjust for baseline risk among patients treated by male versus female operators in the primary analysis.
Results: During this time, 18 female interventionalists and 385 male interventionalists had performed at least one PCI. Female interventionalists performed 6362 (2.7%) of 239,420 cases. There were no differences in the odds of mortality (1.48% vs. 1.56%, adjusted OR [aOR] 1.138, 95% CI: 0.891-1.452), acute kidney injury (3.42% vs. 3.28%, aOR 1.027, 95% CI: 0.819-1.288), transfusion (2.59% vs. 2.85%, aOR 1.168, 95% CI: 0.980-1.390) or major bleeding (0.95% vs. 1.07%, aOR 1.083, 95% CI: 0.825-1.420) between patients treated by female versus male interventionalist. While the absolute differences were small, PCIs performed by female interventional cardiologists were more frequently rated as appropriate (86.64% vs. 84.45%, p-value <0.0001). Female interventional cardiologists more frequently prescribed guideline-directed medical therapy.
Conclusions: We found no significant differences in risk-adjusted in-hospital outcomes between PCIs performed by female versus male interventional cardiologists in Michigan. Female interventional cardiologists more frequently performed PCI rated as appropriate and had a higher likelihood of prescribing guideline-directed medical therapy.
Keywords: appropriateness; gender; interventional; outcomes; sex.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1163-1170. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200004203421603.
-
- Vaccarino V, Rathore SS, Wenger NK, et al. Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(7):671-682. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa032214.
-
- Kim LK, Looser P, Swaminathan RV, et al. Sex-based disparities in incidence, treatment, and outcomes of cardiac arrest in the United States, 2003-2012. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003704.
-
- Potts J, Sirker A, Martinez SC, et al. Persistent sex disparities in clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from 6.6 million PCI procedures in the United States. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203325.
-
- Zachura M, Wilczek K, Janion M, Gąsior M, Gierlotka M, Sadowski M. Long-term outcomes in men and women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and incomplete reperfusion after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a 2-year follow-up. Coron Artery Dis. 2019;30(3):171-176. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000703.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous

