Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005-2020)
- PMID: 34000842
- PMCID: PMC8597197
- DOI: 10.1177/19375867211009273
Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005-2020)
Abstract
Background: The intensive care environment in hospitals has been the subject of significant empirical and qualitative research in the 2005-2020 period. Particular attention has been devoted to the role of infection control, family engagement, staff performance, and the built environment ramifications of the recent COVID-19 global pandemic. A comprehensive review of this literature is reported summarizing recent advancements in this rapidly expanding body of knowledge.
Purpose and aim: This comprehensive review conceptually structures the recent medical intensive care literature to provide conceptual clarity and identify current priorities and future evidence-based research and design priorities.
Method and result: Each source reviewed was classified as one of the five types-opinion pieces/essays, cross-sectional empirical investigations, nonrandomized comparative investigations, randomized studies, and policy review essays-and into nine content categories: nature engagement and outdoor views; family accommodations; intensive care unit (ICU), neonatal ICU, and pediatric ICU spatial configuration and amenity; noise considerations; artificial and natural lighting; patient safety and infection control; portable critical care field hospitals and disaster mitigation facilities including COVID-19; ecological sustainability; and recent planning and design trends and prognostications.
Conclusions: Among the findings embodied in the 135 literature sources reviewed, single-bed ICU rooms have increasingly become the norm; family engagement in the ICU experience has increased; acknowledgment of the therapeutic role of staff amenities; exposure to nature, view, and natural daylight has increased; the importance of ecological sustainability; and pandemic concerns have increased significantly in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Discussion of the results of this comprehensive review includes topics noticeably overlooked or underinvestigated in the 2005-2020 period and priorities for future research.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; evidence-based design (EBD); family-centered care; infection control; inpatient hospitals; intensive care units (ICUs); literature review; patient-/person-centered care; staff effectiveness.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Abo Elenien O., Nour M. (2017). Applying flexibility spatial guidelines on an intensive care unit to increase its sustainability and life expectancy. Port-Said Engineering Research Journal, 21(2), 199–205.
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2002). Guidelines for perinatal care (5th ed.) https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/-/media/3a22e15....
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. (1997). Noise: A hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics, 100(4), 724–727. - PubMed
-
- Apple M. (2014). A comparative evaluation of Swedish intensive care patient rooms. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(3), 78–93. - PubMed
-
- Arenson B. G., MacDonald L. A., Grocott H. P., Hiebert B. M., Arora R. C. (2013). Effect of intensive care unit environment on in-hospital delirium after cardiac surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 146(1), 172–178. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
