Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;35(12):3383-3393.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01281-7. Epub 2021 May 17.

Determinants of CD19-positive vs CD19-negative relapse after tisagenlecleucel for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations

Determinants of CD19-positive vs CD19-negative relapse after tisagenlecleucel for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Marie-Emilie Dourthe et al. Leukemia. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Tisagenlecleucel therapy has shown promising efficacy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, relapses occur in 30-50% of patients. Determinants for CD19pos versus CD19neg relapses are poorly characterized. We report on 51 patients with R/R BCP-ALL (median age 17 years) infused with tisagenlecleucel after lymphodepletion. Complete remission rate at D28 was 96%. Prior blinatumomab increased the risk of early failure at D28. The 18-month cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were 51%, 44%, and 74%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 15.5 months. Factors associated with a high tumor burden (occurrence of cytokine release syndrome) and prior blinatumomab were associated with an increased CIR, and a shorter EFS and OS. Pre-lymphodepletion high disease burden (MRD ≥ 10-2, SHR 10.4, p = 0.03) and detectable MRD at D28 (SHR 7.2, p = 0.006) correlated with an increased risk of CD19neg relapse. Low disease burden (SHR 5.3, p = 0.03) and loss of B-cell aplasia (BCA) (SHR 21.7, p = 0.004) predicted an increased risk of CD19pos relapses. These data highlight the impact of prior therapy on patient outcome. Finally, detectable MRD at D28 and loss of BCA both define patients at high risk of relapse for whom additional interventions are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pui C-H, Evans WE. A 50-year journey to cure childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2013;50:185–96. - DOI
    1. Boissel N, Baruchel A. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescent and young adults: treat as adults or as children? Blood. 2018;132:351–61. - DOI
    1. Sun W, Malvar J, Sposto R, Verma A, Wilkes JJ, Dennis R, et al. Outcome of children with multiply relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a therapeutic advances in childhood leukemia & lymphoma study. Leukemia. 2018;32:2316–25. - DOI
    1. Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Bader P, Jeha S, Schlegel P-G, Bourquin J-P, et al. Blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor and molecularly resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL): updated analysis of 110 patients treated in an Expanded Access Study (RIALTO). Blood. 2019;134:1294. - DOI
    1. Bhojwani D, Sposto R, Shah NN, Rodriguez V, Yuan C, Stetler-Stevenson M, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2019;33:884–92. - DOI

MeSH terms