Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;20(2):233-243.
doi: 10.1002/wps.20858.

The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services

Affiliations

The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez et al. World Psychiatry. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether, following two years of specialized support for first-episode psychosis, the addition of a new digital intervention (Horyzons) to treatment as usual (TAU) for 18 months was more effective than 18 months of TAU alone. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants were people with first-episode psychosis (N=170), aged 16-27 years, in clinical remission and nearing discharge from a specialized service. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Horyzons plus TAU (N=86) or TAU alone (N=84) between October 2013 and January 2017. Horyzons is a novel, comprehensive digital platform merging: peer-to-peer social networking; theory-driven and evidence-informed therapeutic interventions targeting social functioning, vocational recovery and relapse prevention; expert clinician and vocational support; and peer support and moderation. TAU involved transfer to primary or tertiary community mental health services. The primary outcome was social functioning at 18 months as measured by the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). Forty-seven participants (55.5%) in the Horyzons plus TAU group logged on for at least 6 months, and 40 (47.0%) for at least 9 months. Social functioning remained high and stable in both groups from baseline to 18-month follow-up, with no evidence of significant between-group differences (PSP mean difference: -0.29, 95% CI: -4.20 to 3.63, p=0.77). Participants in the Horyzons group had a 5.5 times greater increase in their odds to find employment or enroll in education compared with those in TAU (odds ratio, OR=5.55, 95% CI: 1.09-28.23, p=0.04), with evidence of a dose-response effect. Moreover, participants in TAU were twice as likely to visit emergency services compared to those in the Horyzons group (39% vs. 19%; OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.86, p=0.03, number needed to treat, NNT=5). There was a non-significant trend for lower hospitalizations due to psychosis in the Horyzons group vs. TAU (13% vs. 27%; OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.11-1.08, p=0.07, NNT=7). So, although we did not find a significant effect of Horyzons on social functioning compared with TAU, the intervention was effective in improving vocational or educational attainment, a core component of social recovery, and in reducing usage of hospital emergency services, a key aim of specialized first-episode psychosis services. Horyzons holds significant promise as an engaging and sustainable intervention to provide effective vocational and relapse prevention support for young people with first-episode psychosis beyond specialist services.

Keywords: Horyzons; digital intervention; educational attainment; employment; first-episode psychosis; hospitalization; peer support; social functioning; use of emergency services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile. EPPIC – Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, TAU – treatment as usual

References

    1. Alvarez‐Jimenez M, Priede A, Hetrick SE et al. Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies. Schizophr Res 2012;139:116‐28. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez‐Jimenez M, Parker AG, Hetrick SE et al. Preventing the second episode: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of psychosocial and pharmacological trials in first‐episode psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2011;37:619‐30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertelsen M, Jeppesen P, Petersen L et al. Five‐year follow‐up of a ran­domized multicenter trial of intensive early intervention vs standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness: the OPUS trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65:762‐71. - PubMed
    1. Gafoor R, Nitsch D, McCrone P et al. Effect of early intervention on 5‐year outcome in non‐affective psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2010;196:372‐6. - PubMed
    1. Killackey E, Allott K, Jackson HJ et al. Individual placement and support for vocational recovery in first‐episode psychosis: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2019;214:76‐82. - PubMed