Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 18;11(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00315-1.

Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review

Gintare Valentelyte  1   2 , Conor Keegan  3 , Jan Sorensen  4
Affiliations

Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review

Gintare Valentelyte et al. Health Econ Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Activity-Based Funding (ABF) has been implemented across many countries as a means to incentivise efficient hospital care delivery and resource use. Previous reviews have assessed the impact of ABF implementation on a range of outcomes across health systems. However, no comprehensive review of the methods used to generate this evidence has been undertaken. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the analytical methods employed in research on ABF hospital performance outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Five academic databases and reference lists of included studies were used to identify studies assessing the impact of ABF on hospital performance outcomes. Peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 2000 and 2019 considering ABF implementation outside the U.S. were included. Qualitative studies, policy discussions and commentaries were excluded. Abstracts and full text studies were double screened to ensure consistency. All analytical approaches and their relative strengths and weaknesses were charted and summarised.

Results: We identified 19 studies that assessed hospital performance outcomes from introduction of ABF in England, Korea, Norway, Portugal, Israel, the Netherlands, Canada, Italy, Japan, Belgium, China, and Austria. Quasi-experimental methods were used across most reviewed studies. The most commonly used assessment methods were different forms of interrupted time series analyses. Few studies used difference-in-differences or similar methods to compare outcome changes over time relative to comparator groups. The main hospital performance outcome measures examined were case numbers, length of stay, mortality and readmission.

Conclusions: Non-experimental study designs continue to be the most widely used method in the assessment of ABF impacts. Quasi-experimental approaches examining the impact of ABF implementation on outcomes relative to comparator groups not subject to the reform should be applied where possible to facilitate identification of effects. These approaches provide a more robust evidence-base for informing future financing reform and policy.

Keywords: Activity-based funding; Analytical methodology; Hospital funding; Hospital performance; Outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baxter PE, Hewko SJ, Pfaff KA, Cleghorn L, Cunningham BJ, Elston D, Cummings GG. Leaders' experiences and perceptions implementing activity-based funding and pay-for-performance hospital funding models: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2015;119(8):1096–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palmer KS, Agoritsas T, Martin D, Scott T, Mulla SM, Miller AP, Agarwal A, Bresnahan A, Hazzan AA, Jeffery RA, Merglen A, Negm A, Siemieniuk RA, Bhatnagar N, Dhalla IA, Lavis JN, You JJ, Duckett SJ, Guyatt GH. Activity-based funding of hospitals and its impact on mortality, readmission, discharge destination, severity of illness, and volume of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109975. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Street A, Vitikainen K, Bjorvatn A, Hvenegaard A. Introducing activity-based financing: a review of experience in Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Working Papers 030cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. 2007.
    1. Street A, Maynard A. Activity based financing in England: the need for continual refinement of payment by results. Health Econ Policy Law. 2007;2(4):419–427. doi: 10.1017/S174413310700429X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brick A, Nolan A, O'Reilly J, Smith S. Resource Allocation, Financing and Sustainability in Health Care. Evidence for the Expert Group on Resource Allocation and Financing in the Health Sector. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI); 2010; 2010.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources