Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):17.
doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.3.17.

Validation of a Diagnostic Support System for Diabetic Retinopathy Based on Clinical Parameters

Affiliations

Validation of a Diagnostic Support System for Diabetic Retinopathy Based on Clinical Parameters

Pedro Romero-Aroca et al. Transl Vis Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that estimates risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to personalize screening protocols in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

Methods: We utilized a CDSS based on a fuzzy random forest, integrated by fuzzy decision trees with the following variables: current age, sex, arterial hypertension, diabetes duration and treatment, HbA1c, glomerular filtration rate, microalbuminuria, and body mass index. Validation was made using the electronic health records of a sample of 101,802 T2DM patients. Diagnosis was made by retinal photographs, according to EURODIAB guidelines and the International Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.

Results: The prevalence of DR was 19,759 patients (19.98%). Results yielded 16,593 (16.31%) true positives, 72,617 (71.33%) true negatives, 3165 (3.1%) false positives, and 9427 (9.26%) false negatives, with an accuracy of 0.876 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.858-0.886), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 83.46-84.49), specificity of 88.5% (95% CI, 88.29-88.72), positive predictive value of 63.8% (95% CI, 63.18-64.35), negative predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI, 95.68-95.96), positive likelihood ratio of 7.30, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.18. The type 1 error was 0.115, and the type 2 error was 0.16.

Conclusions: We confirmed a good prediction rate for DR from a representative sample of T2DM in our population. Furthermore, the CDSS was able to offer an individualized screening protocol for each patient according to the calculated risk confidence value.

Translational relevance: Results from this study will help to establish a novel strategy for personalizing screening for DR according to patient risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: P. Romero-Aroca, None; R. Verges-Pujol, None; E. Santos-Blanco, None; N. Maarof, None; A. Valls, None; X. Mundet, None; A. Moreno, None; L. Galindo, None; M. Baget-Bernaldiz, None

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Example of CDSS. Top, an example of a patient at risk of DR; bottom, an example of non-DR risk and the next visit personalized at 36 months.

References

    1. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ.. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87(1): 4–14 - PubMed
    1. Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C.. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015; 2: 17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Sabanayagam C.. The war on diabetic retinopathy: where are we now? Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) . 2019; 8(6): 448–456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Sun J, Kawasaki R, et al. .. Guidelines on diabetic eye care: the International Council of Ophthalmology recommendations for screening, follow-up, referral, and treatment based on resource settings. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125(10): 1608–1622. - PubMed
    1. Gillibrand W, Broadbent D, Harding S, Vora J. The English national risk-reduction programme for preservation of sight in diabetes. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004; 261(1-2): 183–185. - PubMed

Publication types