Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):20.
doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.3.20.

A Virtual Reality-Based Automated Perimeter, Device, and Pilot Study

Affiliations

A Virtual Reality-Based Automated Perimeter, Device, and Pilot Study

Mario Montelongo et al. Transl Vis Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe a novel, virtual reality (VR)-based platform for evaluating visual fields.

Methods: Three subjects were tested on the VisuALL VR headset. Data collected included test duration per eye, total fixation losses (FLs), total false positives (FPs), and total false negatives (FNs). Mean threshold values were collected from the superior temporal (ST), superior nasal (SN), inferior nasal (IN), inferior temporal (IT) quadrants, and from the central 12 degrees (central), 12 to 24 degrees (pericentral), and from all testing loci (global).

Results: Six eyes of 3 subjects (2 men, 1 woman; mean age 30 years) were tested using the T-24 protocol (a Humphrey visual field [HVF] 24-2 equivalent). Mean test duration was 4.43 ± (SD) 0.11 minutes/eye. Mean threshold values ± SD for ST, SN, IN, IT, global, central, and pericentral were 31.1 ± 0.95 decibel (dB), 31.9 ± 0.3 dB, 32.0 ± 0.3 dB, 32.0 ± 1.1 dB, 31.9 ± 0.5 dB, 32.8 ± 0.5 dB, and 31.5 ± 0.5 dB, respectively.

Conclusions: This work describes the technical aspects of the VisuALL. Participants were able to complete the test and generate threshold values at each of 50 locations in the central 24 degrees of visual field. This VR-based visual field test shows potential to become an alternative to analog, stationary standard automated perimetry tests.

Translational relevance: The VisuALL is an immersive, VR-based, automated perimeter that effectively addresses some of the limitations inherent to other popular perimetric devices. Potential advantages of the VisuALL are its adaptability, portability, and efficiency for patients. This device may be able to fill the gap present in at-home glaucoma monitoring and expand the reach of glaucoma management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: M. Montelongo, None; A. Gonzalez, Olleyes (I, E, P); F. Morgenstern, Olleyes (I, E, P); S.P. Donahue, Olleyes (C, I); S. Groth, None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The VisuALL head mounted device (HMD) and Bluetooth connected handpiece.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
VisuALL screen luminance (cd/m2) versus RBG (gray scale) values.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Report generated after completion of a test using the VisuALL.

References

    1. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzén H.. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997; 75(4): 368–375. - PubMed
    1. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J.. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 76(2): 165–169. - PubMed
    1. Morales J, Weitzman ML, González De La Rosa M. Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(1): 134–142. - PubMed
    1. Tanna AP, Budenz DL, Bandi J, et al. .. Glaucoma progression analysis software compared with expert consensus opinion in the detection of visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(3): 468–473. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP.. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(5): 1400–1407. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources