Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul;54(1):14-23.
doi: 10.1111/apt.16405. Epub 2021 May 18.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: volatile organic compound analysis to improve faecal immunochemical testing in the detection of colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review with meta-analysis: volatile organic compound analysis to improve faecal immunochemical testing in the detection of colorectal cancer

Subashini Chandrapalan et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is emerging as a valid test to rule-out the presence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the accuracy of FIT is dependent on the cut-off applied. An additional low-cost test could improve further detection of CRC.

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of combined FIT and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the detection of CRC within symptomatic populations.

Methods: Systematic reviews on the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and VOC, for the detection of CRC, were updated. Meta-analyses were performed adopting a bivariate model for sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility of combined FIT and VOC was estimated using Fagan's nomogram. Post-test probability of FIT negatives was used as a pre-test probability for VOC.

Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FIT at 10 µg/g faeces, for the detection of CRC, were 0.914 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.894-0.936) and 0.783 (CI = 0.850-0.696), respectively. For VOC, the sensitivity was 0.837 (CI = 0.781-0.881) and the specificity was 0.803 (CI = 0.870-0.712). The area under the curve for FIT and VOC were 0.926 and 0.885, respectively. In a population with 5% CRC prevalence, the estimated probability of having CRC following a negative FIT was 0.5% and following both negative FIT and VOC was 0.1%.

Conclusions: In a FIT-negative symptomatic population, VOC can be a good test to rule-out the presence of CRC. The estimated probability reduction by 0.4% when both tests being negative offers adequate safety netting in primary care for the exclusion of CRC. The number needed to colonoscope to identify one CRC is eight if either FIT or VOC positive. Cost-effectiveness and clinical accuracy of this approach will need further evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. NICE, National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Suspected Cancer: Recognition and Referral. NICE Guideline; 2015.
    1. Stonestreet J, Chandrapalan S, Woolley D, Uthman O, Arasaradnam RP. Systematic review and meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of faecal immuno-chemical testing for haemoglobin (FIT) in detecting colorectal cancer for both symptomatic and screening population. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019;82:291-299.
    1. Farrugia A, Widlak M, Evans C, Smith SC, Arasaradnam R. Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in symptomatic patients: what are we missing? Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020;11:28-33.
    1. Wong MCS, Ching JYL, Chan VCW, et al. Factors associated with false-positive and false-negative fecal immunochemical test results for colorectal cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:596-607.
    1. Ibañez-Sanz G, Garcia M, Milà N, et al. False-negative rate cannot be reduced by lowering the haemoglobin concentration cut-off in colorectal cancer screening using faecal immunochemical test. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017;26:365-367.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources