The impact of COVID-19 on anaesthesia and critical care services in the UK: a serial service evaluation
- PMID: 34005837
- PMCID: PMC8222939
- DOI: 10.1111/anae.15512
The impact of COVID-19 on anaesthesia and critical care services in the UK: a serial service evaluation
Abstract
Between October 2020 and January 2021, we conducted three national surveys to track anaesthetic, surgical and critical care activity during the second COVID-19 pandemic wave in the UK. We surveyed all NHS hospitals where surgery is undertaken. Response rates, by round, were 64%, 56% and 51%. Despite important regional variations, the surveys showed increasing systemic pressure on anaesthetic and peri-operative services due to the need to support critical care pandemic demands. During Rounds 1 and 2, approximately one in eight anaesthetic staff were not available for anaesthetic work. Approximately one in five operating theatres were closed and activity fell in those that were open. Some mitigation was achieved by relocation of surgical activity to other locations. Approximately one-quarter of all surgical activity was lost, with paediatric and non-cancer surgery most impacted. During January 2021, the system was largely overwhelmed. Almost one-third of anaesthesia staff were unavailable, 42% of operating theatres were closed, national surgical activity reduced to less than half, including reduced cancer and emergency surgery. Redeployed anaesthesia staff increased the critical care workforce by 125%. Three-quarters of critical care units were so expanded that planned surgery could not be safely resumed. At all times, the greatest resource limitation was staff. Due to lower response rates from the most pressed regions and hospitals, these results may underestimate the true impact. These findings have important implications for understanding what has happened during the COVID-19 pandemic, planning recovery and building a system that will better respond to future waves or new epidemics.
Keywords: COVID-19; anaesthesia; critical care; peri-operative medicine.
© 2021 Association of Anaesthetists.
Figures





Comment in
-
Staff: our most valuable asset.Anaesthesia. 2021 Sep;76(9):1151-1154. doi: 10.1111/anae.15543. Epub 2021 Jul 20. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID: 34287837 No abstract available.
References
-
- Intensive Care Society . Recovery and Restitution of Critical Care Services during the COVID‐19 pandemic. 2021. https://www.baccn.org/static/uploads/resources/Recovery_and_Restitution_... (accessed 08/04/2021).
-
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre . ICNARC report on COVID‐19 in critical care: England. Wales and Northern Ireland. 2021. https://www.icnarc.org/Our‐Audit/Audits/Cmp/Reports (accessed 08/04/2021).
-
- Stevens S, Pritchard A. Third phase of NHS response to. COVID‐19. 2020. https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp‐content/uploads/sites/52/2020/... (accessed 10/04/2021).
-
- Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Society, Association of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Anaesthetists . Anaesthesia and critical care: guidance for Clinical Directors on preparations for a possible second surge in COVID‐19. 2020. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e6613a1dc75b87df82b78e1/t/5f68ce... (accessed 06/04/2021).
-
- Health Research Authority . HRA decision tools: defining research. 2017. http://www.hra‐decisiontools.org.uk/research/docs/DefiningResearchTable_... (accessed 10/04/2021).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical