Improved reporting of adverse drug reactions
- PMID: 3400650
Improved reporting of adverse drug reactions
Abstract
A program using satellite pharmacists to improve adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting in an 1100-bed teaching hospital is described. Because relying on physicians to report ADRs had met with little success (only six reports in seven years), the pharmacy department proposed that pharmacists in satellite pharmacies on patient-care units be called upon to identify and report ADRs. To begin this program, an ADR team composed of a physician, pharmacist, and nurse made weekly rounds of the satellite pharmacies to assist pharmacists in identifying potential ADRs. The FDA definition of an ADR was adopted. Also, inservice education programs about ADR reporting were conducted for pharmacists and nurses. Currently, suspected ADRs are reported to the satellite pharmacist, who forwards a completed drug reaction report form to the assistant director for clinical pharmacy services. Reports are discussed quarterly by the ADR subcommittee of the pharmacy and therapeutics committee; the sub-committee members determine whether any follow-up action is needed. In the first three years after implementation of this program, 306 ADRs were reported; 90% of the reports were filed by pharmacists. An ADR reporting system based on reporting by staff pharmacists has been effective in increasing the number of reported reactions and pharmacist involvement in monitoring patients for ADRs.
Similar articles
-
Pharmacy-coordinated program that encourages physician reporting of adverse drug reactions.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Jun;47(6):1327-33. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990. PMID: 2368726
-
Use of standardized screening procedures to identify adverse drug reactions.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Jun;47(6):1314-20. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990. PMID: 2368724
-
Use of a database computer program to identify trends in reporting of adverse drug reactions.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Jun;47(6):1321-7. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990. PMID: 2368725
-
Review of Canadian pharmacist involvement in adverse drug reaction reporting.Can J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Jun;42(3):105-8, 133. Can J Hosp Pharm. 1989. PMID: 10318271 Review.
-
The role of hospital and community pharmacists in pharmacovigilance.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005 Mar;1(1):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2004.12.009. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005. PMID: 17138470 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving the performance of Drug and Therapeutics Committees in hospitals--a quasi-experimental study in Laos.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;62(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0069-8. Epub 2005 Dec 22. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16372173
-
Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions.Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Feb;16(2):108-124. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0303-0. Epub 2020 Jan 23. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020. PMID: 31974455 Review.
-
Effect of an intervention on the features of adverse drug reactions spontaneously reported in a hospital.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;66(9):937-45. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0856-8. Epub 2010 Jun 16. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 20552176
-
Evaluating the Training, Responsibilities, and Practices of P&T Committee Members and Nonmember Contributors.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):868-874. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.868. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017. PMID: 28737984 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a critical and systematic review.Drug Saf. 2013 May;36(5):317-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0058-2. Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 23640659
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous