Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 18;11(1):10513.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90133-6.

Incremental value of QT interval for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain

Affiliations

Incremental value of QT interval for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain

Dong-Hyuk Cho et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Identification of obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) in patients with chest pain is a clinical challenge. The value of corrected QT interval (QTc) for the prediction of OCAD has yet to be established. We consecutively enrolled 1741 patients with suspected angina. The presence of obstructive OCAD was defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by coronary angiography. The pre-test probability was evaluated by combining QTc prolongation with the CAD Consortium clinical score (CAD2) and the updated Diamond-Forrester (UDF) score. OCAD was detected in 661 patients (38.0%). QTc was longer in patients with OCAD compared with those without OCAD (444 ± 34 vs. 429 ± 28 ms, p < 0.001). QTc was increased by the severity of OCAD (P < 0.001). QTc prolongation was associated with OCAD (odds ratio (OR), 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.81-2.85). With QTc, the C-statistics increased significantly from 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.71) to 0.76 (95% CI 0.74-0.78) in the CAD2 and from 0.64 (95% CI 0.62-0.67) to 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.77) in the UDF score, respectively. QT prolongation predicted the presence of OCAD and the QTc improved model performance to predict OCAD compared with CAD2 or UDF scores in patients with suspected angina.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Corrected QT interval according to the number of diseased vessels (a) and stenosis (b) of OCAD in total subjects, men and women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC analysis for the additive value of corrected QT interval compared with (a) CAD2 score and (b) UDF score to predict obstructive coronary artery disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC analysis for additive value of corrected QT interval compared with (a) CAD2 score and (b) UDF score to predict obstructive coronary artery disease in men and women.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Nieman K, et al. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: Validation, updating, and extension. Eur. Heart J. 2011;32(11):1316–1330. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG, Nieman K, Galema TW, Mollet NR, et al. Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: Retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts. BMJ. 2012;344:e3485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3485. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baskaran L, Danad I, Gransar H, Ó Hartaigh B, Schulman-Marcus J, Lin FY, et al. A comparison of the updated Diamond-Forrester, CAD Consortium, and CONFIRM history-based risk scores for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain: The SCOT-HEART Coronary CTA Cohort. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2019;12(7 Pt 2):1392–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Straus SM, Kors JA, De Bruin ML, van der Hooft CS, Hofman A, Heeringa J, et al. Prolonged QTc interval and risk of sudden cardiac death in a population of older adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006;47(2):362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.067. - DOI - PubMed