Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug 8;10(3):10.24926/iip.v10i3.1799.
doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i3.1799. eCollection 2019.

Immuno-Oncology Medicines: Policy Implications and Economic Considerations

Affiliations
Review

Immuno-Oncology Medicines: Policy Implications and Economic Considerations

Georges Adunlin et al. Innov Pharm. .

Abstract

Significant progress has taken place in the field of cancer immunotherapy in recent years. Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown rather dramatic results and are believed to have completely transformed the field of oncology. However, these transformational therapies are more expensive than previous cancer therapies. As more cancer immunotherapy agents are being developed, with some already being marketed, it is important to consider how economic constraints will shape health policy and value assessment related to these agents. A number of strategies have been suggested to alleviate the price burden and the ensuing concerns about the sustainability of publicly funded healthcare systems. Among these strategies, value-based pricing (VBP) for innovative drugs dominates the headlines in the field of oncology. The specifics of how VBP may be implemented in the United States is still unclear. Nonetheless, policy reform and economic considerations will have to be incorporated into the planning of VBP. The objective of this paper is multifold: (i) to identify the factors affecting the impact of cancer immunotherapy on healthcare cost; (ii) to critically appraise current approaches used to assess the value of novel cancer therapies; (iii) to assess the methodological challenges associated with the economic evaluation of cancer immunotherapy. As the health care system in the U.S transitions toward a value-based model, the need for a formal value assessment framework is warranted in cancer immunotherapy.

Keywords: cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; value-based pricing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: We declare no conflicts of interest or financial interests that the authors or members of their immediate families have in any product or service discussed in the manuscript, including grants (pending or received), employment, gifts, stock holdings or options, honoraria, consultancies, expert testimony, patents and royalties.

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2019.
    1. Yabroff KR, Dowling EC, Guy GP, Jr, et al. Financial hardship associated with cancer in the United States: findings from a population-based sample of adult cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(3):259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2011;103(2):117–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masters GA, Krilov L, Bailey HH, et al. Clinical cancer advances 2015: Annual report on progress against cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33(7):786–809. - PubMed
    1. Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature. 2011;480(7378):480–489. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources