Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 30;10(1):1225.
doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v10i1.1225. eCollection 2021.

Improving laboratory quality and capacity through leadership and management training: Lessons from Zambia 2016-2018

Affiliations

Improving laboratory quality and capacity through leadership and management training: Lessons from Zambia 2016-2018

Felicity Gopolang et al. Afr J Lab Med. .

Abstract

Background: Competent leadership and management are imperative for delivering quality laboratory services; however, few laboratory managers receive job-specific training in organisational management and leadership.

Objective: To develop and evaluate participants' competencies in organisational leadership and management as measured through learner and laboratory quality improvement assessments.

Methods: This professional development programme employed a mentored, blended learning approach, utilising in-person didactic and online training, with the practical application of a capstone project in the laboratories. Programme impact was evaluated through a series of pre- and post-laboartory assessments using the Stepwise Laboratory Improvement Process Towards Accreditation checklist, as well as learner-competency assessments through online quizzes and discussions.

Results: From 2016 to 2018, 31 managers and quality officers from 16 individual laboratories graduated from the programme having completed capstone projects addressing areas in the entire laboratory testing process. Laboratories increased their compliance with the International Organization for Standardization 15189 standard and all but two laboratories significantly increased their accreditation scores. Two laboratories gained three stars, two laboratories gained two stars, and five laboratories gained one star. Five laboratories subsequently achieved International Organization for Standardization 15189 accreditation in 2019.

Conclusion: This programme taught leadership theory to laboratory managers and allowed them to implement leadership and management practices in the laboratory setting. Programmes such as this complement existing laboratory quality management training programmes such as Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation.

Keywords: leadership; quality management; workforce development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Structural overview for the laboratory leadership and management programme in Zambia, 2016–2018. Two cohorts of participants from 16 laboratories across Zambia participated from 2016–2018, each cohort taking 9 months to complete the programme work. Both programme years utilised a similar approach to adult experiential learning, utilising a blended solution of online and face-to-face instruction, a robust online discussion board as well as close faculty and mentorship support for individual capstone projects conducted at participant’s home laboratories. Orientation and finale sessions were conducted in Lusaka. Seventeen laboratory managers from 16 laboratories completed the 2016–2017 programme and completed 16 unique capstone projects. For the second cohort, 16 laboratory managers and 15 quality managers completed the programme and conducted 15 unique capstone projects.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Changes in laboratory audit scores before (2016) and after (2018) the Laboratory leadership and management programme in Zambia, 2016-2018. Participants and representatives from the Ministry of Health conducted baseline Stepwise Laboratory Improvement Program Towards Accreditation audits of each laboratory at the beginning (2016) and end of the programme (2018). Audit scores are shown as whole numbers with a maximum score of 275 points.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Participants’ self-perceived changes in key abilities after laboratory leadership and management programme in Zambia, 2016–2018. A Likert scale-based survey conducted of all programme graduates was conducted in 2018 by an external organisation. Graduates of the programme self-reported key changes in abilities as a result of the programme (n = 24 respondants) and percentage of each response were calculated and shown here.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martin R, Barnhart S. Global laboratory systems development: Needs and approaches. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011;25(3):677–691. 10.1016/j.idc.2011.05.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olmsted SS, Moore M, Meili RC, et al. . Strengthening laboratory systems in resource-limited settings. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010. September;134(3):374–380. 10.1309/AJCPDQOSB7QR5GLR - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith T, Stankunas M, Czabanowska K, De Jong N, O’Connor S, Fowler Davis S. Principles of all-inclusive public health: Developing a public health leadership curriculum. Public Health. 2015. February;129(2):182–184. 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Renner AS, Bennett S. Developing the next generation of laboratory leaders [homepage on the Internet]. Clinical Laboratory News 2015. November 01 [cited 2019 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.aacc.org/publications/cln/articles/2015/november/developing-...
    1. DeBoy JM, Beck AJ, Boulton ML, Kim DH, Wichman MD, Luedtke PF. Core courses in public health laboratory science and practice: Findings from 2006 and 2011 surveys. Public Health Rep. 2013;128 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):105–114. 10.1177/00333549131280S215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources