Development of a prognostic prediction model to estimate the risk of multiple chronic diseases: constructing a copula-based model using Canadian primary care electronic medical record data
- PMID: 34007897
- PMCID: PMC8112224
- DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1395
Development of a prognostic prediction model to estimate the risk of multiple chronic diseases: constructing a copula-based model using Canadian primary care electronic medical record data
Abstract
Introduction: The ability to estimate risk of multimorbidity will provide valuable information to patients and primary care practitioners in their preventative efforts. Current methods for prognostic prediction modelling are insufficient for the estimation of risk for multiple outcomes, as they do not properly capture the dependence that exists between outcomes.
Objectives: We developed a multivariate prognostic prediction model for the 5-year risk of diabetes, hypertension, and osteoarthritis that quantifies and accounts for the dependence between each disease using a copula-based model.
Methods: We used data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) from 2009 onwards, a collection of electronic medical records submitted by participating primary care practitioners across Canada. We identified patients 18 years and older without all three outcome diseases and observed any incident diabetes, osteoarthritis, or hypertension within 5-years, resulting in a large retrospective cohort for model development and internal validation (n=425,228). First, we quantified the dependence between outcomes using unadjusted and adjusted Ø coefficients. We then estimated a copula-based model to quantify the non-linear dependence between outcomes that can be used to derive risk estimates for each outcome, accounting for the observed dependence. Copula-based models are defined by univariate models for each outcome and a dependence function, specified by the parameter θ. Logistic regression was used for the univariate models and the Frank copula was selected as the dependence function.
Results: All outcome pairs demonstrated statistically significant dependence that was reduced after adjusting for covariates. The copula-based model yielded statistically significant θ parameters in agreement with the adjusted and unadjusted Ø coefficients. Our copula-based model can effectively be used to estimate trivariate probabilities.
Discussion: Quantitative estimates of multimorbidity risk inform discussions between patients and their primary care practitioners around prevention in an effort to reduce the incidence of multimorbidity.
Keywords: CPCSSN; copula; diabetes; electronic medical records; hypertension; multimorbidity; multivariate; osteoarthritis; primary care; prognostic prediction model; risk estimation.
Conflict of interest statement
Statement on conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Development and evaluation of an osteoarthritis risk model for integration into primary care health information technology.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104160. Epub 2020 May 1. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 32593009
-
Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records.Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jul;12(4):367-72. doi: 10.1370/afm.1644. Ann Fam Med. 2014. PMID: 25024246 Free PMC article.
-
Adult obesity prevalence in primary care users: An exploration using Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) data.Can J Public Health. 2015 Apr 30;106(5):e283-9. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4508. Can J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26451989 Free PMC article.
-
Multivariate copula temporal modeling of intersection crash consequence metrics: A joint estimation of injury severity, crash type, vehicle damage and driver error.Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Feb 13. Accid Anal Prev. 2019. PMID: 30771588 Review.
-
Surgery for epilepsy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 25;6(6):CD010541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31237346 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Implementing artificial intelligence in Canadian primary care: Barriers and strategies identified through a national deliberative dialogue.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0281733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281733. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36848339 Free PMC article.
-
Is primary health care ready for artificial intelligence? What do primary health care stakeholders say?BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01984-6. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022. PMID: 36085203 Free PMC article.
-
Driving role of climatic and socioenvironmental factors on human brucellosis in China: machine-learning-based predictive analyses.Infect Dis Poverty. 2023 Apr 12;12(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01087-y. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023. PMID: 37046326 Free PMC article.
-
The leading global health challenges in the artificial intelligence era.Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 27;11:1328918. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1328918. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38089037 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correlation analysis of diabetes based on Copula.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 14;15:1291895. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1291895. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38419954 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beam AL, Kohane IS. Big data and machine learning in health care. Vol. 319, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association; 2018. p. 1317–8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2675024. 10.1001/jama.2017.18391 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anthony Celi L, Fine B, Stone DJ. An awakening in medicine: the partnership of humanity and intelligent machines. Lancet Digit Heal. 2019;1:e255–7. https://www.thelancet.com/digital-health. 10.1038/s41436-019-0566-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lloyd-Jones DM, Wilson PWF, Larson MG, Beiser A, Leip EP, D’Agostino RB, et al.. Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2004. Jul 1;94(1):20–4. http://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002914904004370/fulltext. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hendriksen JMT, Geersing GJ, Moons KGM, de Groot JAH. Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models. J Thromb Haemost. 2013. Jun;11 Suppl 1:129–41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23809117. 10.1111/jth.12262 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014. Aug 1;35(29):1925–31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24898551. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources