Early dynamic changes within the spine following posterior fusion using hybrid instrumentation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a gait analysis study
- PMID: 34008049
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03956-3
Early dynamic changes within the spine following posterior fusion using hybrid instrumentation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a gait analysis study
Abstract
Introduction: In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, mechanical consequences of posterior spinal fusion within the spine remain unclear. Through dynamic assessment, gait analysis could help elucidating this particular point. The aim of this study was to describe early changes within the spine following fusion with hybrid instrumentation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, using gait analysis MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-centre prospective study including AIS patients scheduled for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using hybrid instrumentation with sublaminar bands. Patients underwent radiographic and gait analyses preoperatively and during early postoperative period. Among gait parameters, motion of cervicothoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions was measured in the three planes.
Results: We included 55 patients (mean age 15 years, 84% girls). Fusion was performed on 12 levels and mean follow-up was 8 months. There was a moderately strong correlation between thoracolumbar sagittal motion and lumbosacral junction pre- and postoperatively (R = - 0.6413 and R = - 0.7040, respectively, all p < 0.001), meaning that the more thoracolumbar junction was in extension, the more lumbosacral extension movements decreased. There was a trend to significance between postoperative SVA change and thoracolumbar sagittal motion change (R = - 0.2550, p = 0.059).
Discussion: This is the first series reporting dynamic changes within the spine following PSF using hybrid instrumentation in AIS patients. PSF led to symmetrization of gait pattern. In the sagittal plane, we found that thoracolumbar extension within the fused area led to decreased extension at cervicothoracic and lumbosacral junctions. Even though consequences of such phenomenon are unclear, attention must be paid not to give a too posterior alignment when performing PSF for AIS patients.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Gait analysis; Hybrid instrumentation; Posterior spinal fusion; Segmental analysis; Sublaminar bands.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Gait changes 2 years after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.Gait Posture. 2025 Jun;119:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.012. Epub 2025 Feb 17. Gait Posture. 2025. PMID: 40020269
-
Radiographic outcomes of anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for treatment of Lenke Type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16):1859-66. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174118.72916.96. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 16103856
-
Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 42 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 24 normal adolescents.Eur Spine J. 2016 Oct;25(10):3226-3233. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4701-3. Epub 2016 Jul 18. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27432428
-
Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 1;44(1):41-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002736. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 29889799
-
Posterior minimally invasive scoliosis surgery versus the standard posterior approach for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 29;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02954-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35093152 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a model for measuring sagittal plane parameters in 10-18-year old adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis based on RTMpose deep learning technology.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 11;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05334-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39799363 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JCY et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet (London, England) 371:1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3 - DOI
-
- Pesenti S, Jouve J-L, Morin C et al (2015) Evolution of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a multicenter study at 20 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:619–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W et al (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1572–1578. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817886a2 - DOI
-
- Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Nathan ST et al (2013) Mid- to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E113–E119. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae3d0 - DOI
-
- Pesenti S, Prost S, Pomero V et al (2020) Does static trunk motion analysis reflect its true position during daily activities in adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.023 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical