Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;23(8):2052-2061.
doi: 10.1111/codi.15743. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

Decision making in the management of adults with malignant colorectal polyps: An exploration of the experiences of patients and clinicians

Clare Westwood  1 , Tom Lee  2 , Robert McSherry  3 , Josette Bettany-Saltikov  4 , Jamie Catlow  1
Affiliations

Decision making in the management of adults with malignant colorectal polyps: An exploration of the experiences of patients and clinicians

Clare Westwood et al. Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: A diagnosis of colorectal polyp cancer presents a treatment dilemma. The decision between segmental resection versus endoscopic surveillance is difficult due to a lack of good quality clinical evidence for either option. The aim of this study was to understand the decision making experiences of both clinicians and patients when faced with such a diagnosis.

Methods: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 10 clinicians involved in the care of patients diagnosed with polyp cancer and five patients who had experience of a diagnosis of polyp cancer. All clinicians and patients were from four hospital trusts across the north of England. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the principles of interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Results: Analysis of the interview transcripts evidenced that clinicians and patients were supportive of a shared approach to treatment decision making in the context of a diagnosis of colorectal polyp cancer. Uncertainty, influences and information were among the themes identified to be preventing this happening at present. This study identified themes which were common to both groups. These were complexity of the risk information, lack of patient information resources, and system factors and time.

Conclusion: This research study has evidenced several factors such as uncertainty, complexity of risk information and influences on decisions which are preventing patients being involved in treatment decisions following a diagnosis of colorectal polyp cancer. Recommendations for improvements in practice, including a framework to assist treatment decision making in the future, are highlighted.

Keywords: malignant colorectal polyps; patient-centred care; polyp cancer; treatment decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Netzer P, Forster C, Biral R, Ruchti C, Neuweiler J, Stauffer E, et al. Risk factor assessment of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps. Gut. 1998;43:669-74.
    1. Logan RF, Patnick J, Nickerson C, Coleman L, Rutter MD, von Wagner C. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut. 2012;61:1439-46.
    1. Williams J, Pullan R, Hill J, Horgan P, Salmo E, Buchanan G, et al. Management of the malignant colorectal polyp: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(s2):1-38.
    1. Richards CH, Ventham NT, Mansouri D, Wilson M, Ramsay G, Mackay CD, et al. An evidence-based treatment algorithm for colorectal polyp cancers: results from the Scottish Screen-detected Polyp Cancer Study (SSPoCS). Gut. 2016;67:299-306.
    1. Gill M, Rutter M, Holtham S. Management and short-term outcome of malignant colorectal polyps in the north of England. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(2):169-76.

LinkOut - more resources