Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 17;47(2):e20200581.
doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200581. eCollection 2021.

Diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in BAL fluid samples from patients under clinical suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis: a tertiary care experience in a high-tuberculosis-burden area

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in BAL fluid samples from patients under clinical suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis: a tertiary care experience in a high-tuberculosis-burden area

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Guilherme Machado Xavier de Brito et al. J Bras Pneumol. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, a rapid molecular test for tuberculosis, comparing it with that of AFB staining and culture, in BAL fluid (BALF) samples from patients with clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) who are sputum smear-negative or produce sputum samples of insufficient quantity.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 140 cases of suspected PTB in patients who were smear-negative or produced insufficient sputum samples and were evaluated at a tertiary teaching hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. All of the patients underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL. The BALF specimens were evaluated by AFB staining, mycobacterial culture, and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay.

Results: Among the 140 patients, results for all three microbiological examinations were available for 73 (52.1%), of whom 22 tested positive on culture, 17 tested positive on AFB staining, and 20 tested positive on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for AFB staining were 68.1%, 96.1%, 88.2%, 87.5%, and 87.6%, respectively, compared with 81.8%, 96.1%, 90.0%, 92.4%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The agreement between AFB staining and culture was 82.3% (kappa = 0.46; p < 0.0001), whereas that between the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and culture was 91.8% (kappa = 0.8; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: In BALF samples, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay performs better than do traditional methods, providing a reliable alternative to sputum analysis in suspected cases of PTB. However, the rate of discordant results merits careful consideration.

Objetivo:: Avaliar o desempenho diagnóstico do teste Xpert MTB/RIF - teste molecular rápido para tuberculose, comparando-o com o da pesquisa de BAAR e da cultura, em amostras de LBA de pacientes com suspeita clínica de tuberculose pulmonar (TBP) que apresentam baciloscopia de escarro negativa ou produzem amostras com quantidade insuficiente de escarro.

Métodos:: Estudo retrospectivo de 140 casos suspeitos de TBP em pacientes que apresentaram baciloscopia negativa ou produziram amostras de escarro insuficientes e foram avaliados em um hospital-escola terciário na cidade do Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à fibrobroncoscopia com LBA. Os espécimes de LBA foram avaliados por meio da realização de pesquisa de BAAR, cultura para micobactérias e teste Xpert MTB/RIF.

Resultados:: Entre os 140 pacientes, resultados de todos os três exames microbiológicos estavam disponíveis para 73 (52,1%), dos quais 22 apresentaram cultura positiva, 17, pesquisa de BAAR positiva, e 20, teste Xpert MTB/RIF positivo. A sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo, valor preditivo negativo e precisão global da pesquisa de BAAR foram de 68,1%, 96,1%, 88,2%, 87,5% e 87,6%, respectivamente, contra 81,8%, 96,1%, 90,0%, 92,4% e 91,8%, respectivamente, do teste Xpert MTB/RIF. A concordância entre a pesquisa de BAAR e a cultura foi de 82,3% (kappa = 0,46; p < 0,0001), enquanto a concordância entre o teste Xpert MTB/RIF e a cultura foi de 91,8% (kappa = 0,8; p < 0,0001).

Conclusões:: Em amostras de LBA, o teste Xpert MTB/RIF tem melhor desempenho do que os métodos tradicionais, fornecendo uma alternativa confiável à análise do escarro em casos suspeitos de TBP. No entanto, a taxa de resultados discordantes merece uma reflexão cuidadosa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study design and yield of the tuberculosis diagnostic tests performed in BAL fluid samples. *Performed in only 130 of the 140 patients. Performed in only 82 of the 140 patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Venn diagram of the positive results of the tuberculosis diagnostic tests performed in BAL fluid samples: Xpert MTB/RIF assay (green), AFB staining (blue), and mycobacterial culture (pink). Note: numerals indicate the number of cases in which Mycobacterium tuberculosis was identified.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329368/9789241565714-en...
    1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde . Manual de para o Controle da Tuberculose. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019.
    1. Shin JA, Chang YS, Kim TH, Kim HJ, Ahn CM, Byun MK. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy for the rapid diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:141–141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-141. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nikbakhsh N, Bayani M, Siadati S. The Value of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Diagnosis of Sputum Smear-Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Iran J Pathol. 2015;10(1):35–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalawat U, Sharma KK, Reddy PN, Kumar AG. Study of bronchoalveolar lavage in clinically and radiologically suspected cases of pulmonary tuberculosis. Lung India. 2010;27(3):122–124. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.68307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed