Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 30;28(8):1756-1764.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab048.

Evaluating resampling methods and structured features to improve fall incident report identification by the severity level

Affiliations

Evaluating resampling methods and structured features to improve fall incident report identification by the severity level

Jiaxing Liu et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to improve the classification of the fall incident severity level by considering data imbalance issues and structured features through machine learning.

Materials and methods: We present an incident report classification (IRC) framework to classify the in-hospital fall incident severity level by addressing the imbalanced class problem and incorporating structured attributes. After text preprocessing, bag-of-words features, structured text features, and structured clinical features were extracted from the reports. Next, resampling techniques were incorporated into the training process. Machine learning algorithms were used to build classification models. IRC systems were trained, validated, and tested using a repeated and randomly stratified shuffle-split cross-validation method. Finally, we evaluated the system performance using the F1-measure, precision, and recall over 15 stratified test sets.

Results: The experimental results demonstrated that the classification system setting considering both data imbalance issues and structured features outperformed the other system settings (with a mean macro-averaged F1-measure of 0.733). Considering the structured features and resampling techniques, this classification system setting significantly improved the mean F1-measure for the rare class by 30.88% (P value < .001) and the mean macro-averaged F1-measure by 8.26% from the baseline system setting (P value < .001). In general, the classification system employing the random forest algorithm and random oversampling method outperformed the others.

Conclusions: Structured features provide essential information for categorizing the fall incident severity level. Resampling methods help rebalance the class distribution of the original incident report data, which improves the performance of machine learning models. The IRC framework presented in this study effectively automates the identification of fall incident reports by the severity level.

Keywords: clinical incident reports; clinical text classification; falls; imbalanced learning; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The IRC framework.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Top 30 important features ranked by permutation importance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Currie L. Fall and Injury Prevention. In: Hughes RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. - PubMed
    1. Healey F, Scobie S, Oliver D, et al.Falls in English and Welsh hospitals: a national observational study based on retrospective analysis of 12 months of patient safety incident reports. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17 (6): 424–30. - PubMed
    1. Dunne TJ, Gaboury I, Ashe MC.. Falls in hospital increase length of stay regardless of degree of harm. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20 (4): 396–400. - PubMed
    1. Hill KD, Vu M, Walsh W.. Falls in the acute hospital setting–impact on resource utilisation. Aust Health Review 2007; 31 (3): 471–7. - PubMed
    1. Brand CA, Sundararajan V.. A 10-year cohort study of the burden and risk of in-hospital falls and fractures using routinely collected hospital data. Quality Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (6): e51–e51. - PubMed

Publication types