Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;69(6):1560-1562.
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_430_21.

Pre-Operative SARS CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction: A conundrum in surgical decision making

K Kiran Kumar  1 , U C Sampritha  1 , Vandana Maganty  1 , Akshata A Prakash  1 , Jessica Basumatary  1 , Karishma Adappa  1 , S Chandraprabha  1 , T G Neeraja  1 , N S Guru Prasad  1 , B Preethi  1 , Suresh Babu Gangasagara  1 , B L Sujatha Rathod  1
Affiliations

Pre-Operative SARS CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction: A conundrum in surgical decision making

K Kiran Kumar et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Since the eye is in close proximity to the oro-nasal cavity, transmission of SARS CoV-2 is higher during ophthalmic surgical procedures, it is vital to ensure the safety of the healthcare team by pre-operative Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) and real-time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS CoV-2 viral RNA of all patients planned for elective or emergency surgery. Hence, understanding the profile of pre-operative RAT and real-time RT-PCR among patients planned for various ophthalmic procedures, will help us make better decisions for future guidelines, for optimal planning of ophthalmic elective or emergency surgeries, keeping in mind the current scenario.

Methods: This is a prospective descriptive study conducted on patients planned for elective or emergency ophthalmic surgeries, who had no COVID-19-related symptoms pre-operatively and were subjected to preoperative RAT and real-time RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal and throat swabs for SARS CoV-2 viral RNA. Data was compiled and statistically analysed.

Results: 204 patients underwent pre-operative RAT and RT-PCR testing; of which, 85 were females and 119 were males. Mean age of the study population was 51.44 ± 16.501 years. Among the 204, 2 tested positive for SARS CoV-2 with Rapid Antigen testing as well as RT-PCR and 10 patients tested positive via RT-PCR after a negative RAT result of the same sample.

Conclusion: Pre-operative testing for COVID-19 disease is indispensable as there is a high chance of transmission from patient to healthcare workers. RAT has the advantage of quick results and may play a role in case of emergency procedures. However, it is prudent to perform the more sensitive real-time RT-PCR before any elective, non-emergency procedures or surgeries to avoid any undue risk to the healthcare team.

Keywords: Pre-operative; SARS CoV-2; rapid antigen testing; real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Comment in

References

    1. Karlsson U, Fraenkel C-J. Covid-19: Risks to healthcare workers and their families. BMJ. 2020;371:m3944. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3944. - PubMed
    1. Xie X, Li Y, Chwang ATY, Ho PL, Seto WH. How far droplets can move in indoor environments--revisiting the Wells evaporation-falling curve. Indoor Air. 2007;17:211–25. - PubMed
    1. Kalkeri R, Goebel S, Sharma GD. SARS-CoV-2 Shedding from asymptomatic patients: Contribution of potential extrapulmonary tissue reservoirs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103:18–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS, Wong KK, Lau C, Lam ET, et al. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020;129:104500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emery SL, Erdman DD, Bowen MD, Newton BR, Winchell JM, Meyer RF, et al. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for SARS-associated coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:311–6. - PMC - PubMed