Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 3:12:669474.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.669474. eCollection 2021.

Differentiation and Regulation of TH Cells: A Balancing Act for Cancer Immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Differentiation and Regulation of TH Cells: A Balancing Act for Cancer Immunotherapy

Amrita Basu et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Current success of immunotherapy in cancer has drawn attention to the subsets of TH cells in the tumor which are critical for activation of anti-tumor response either directly by themselves or by stimulating cytotoxic T cell activity. However, presence of immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic TH subsets in the tumor milieu further contributes to the complexity of regulation of TH cell-mediated immune response. In this review, we present an overview of the multifaceted positive and negative effects of TH cells, with an emphasis on regulation of different TH cell subtypes by various immune cells, and how a delicate balance of contradictory signals can influence overall success of cancer immunotherapy. We focus on the regulatory network that encompasses dendritic cell-induced activation of CD4+ TH1 cells and subsequent priming of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, along with intersecting anti-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic TH2 cell activity. We further discuss how other tumor infiltrating immune cells such as immunostimulatory TH9 and Tfh cells, immunosuppressive Treg cells, and the duality of TH17 function contribute to tip the balance of anti- vs pro-tumorigenic TH responses in the tumor. We highlight the developing knowledge of CD4+ TH1 immune response against neoantigens/oncodrivers, impact of current immunotherapy strategies on CD4+ TH1 immunity, and how opposing action of TH cell subtypes can be explored further to amplify immunotherapy success in patients. Understanding the nuances of CD4+ TH cells regulation and the molecular framework undergirding the balancing act between anti- vs pro-tumorigenic TH subtypes is critical for rational designing of immunotherapies that can bypass therapeutic escape to maximize the potential of immunotherapy.

Keywords: CD4; T helper; immunotherapy; neoantigen; tumor associated antigen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BC and GK have patent application filed for intellectual property on a human version of DC1. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CD4+ T cells development and their functional subsets in immunity. T cell receptor (TCR) signaling activation, co-stimulation and presence of specific cytokines milieu have been shown to stimulate naïve CD4+ T cells polarization and their differentiation into TH1, TH2, TH9, TH17, Tfh and Treg cell subtypes. While TH1, TH9 and Tfh cells (green box) stimulate anti-tumor immune response, TH2 and Treg cells (red box) induce immunosuppressive protumorigenic response and a dual role of TH17 cells contribute to the functional complexity of this network. Primary STAT signaling pathways and major transcription factors regulating CD4+ T cell subtype polarization and key effector cytokines secreted from each Th cell subtypes are depicted. Dendritic cells present tumor antigenic peptides to TH1 cells via MHC class II molecule, leading to TH1 immune response activation. IFN-γ and TNF-α secreted from activated TH1 cells directly act on tumor cells and induce apoptosis, senescence, and proliferation arrest. In addition, TH1 cells can upregulate NK cells and B cells activation to further strengthen anti-tumor immune responses. Activated TH1 cells secrete IL-2 which mediates direct activation of CD8+ T cells expressing IL-2Rα and their proliferation and survival. In contrast, Treg cells and TH17 cells are known to exhibit an immunosuppressive microenvironment that promotes tumor progression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intratumoral balance of anti- vs pro-tumorigenic CD4+ TH cells determine immune response outcome. Activation and downregulation of specific TH cells modulate intratumoral balance of stimulatory and suppressive effectors and modulates tumor response to immunotherapy. Polarization and activation of TH1, TH9 and Tfh subtypes induce secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, and, coupled with simultaneously diminished activity of immunosuppressive TH2 and Treg cells, tip the balance towards anti-tumor immune response and induce tumor regression (left). On the contrary, heightened activity of the immunosuppressive populations and secretion of inhibitory cytokines, and concurrent downregulation of immunostimulatory TH1, TH9 and Tfh cells induce a protumorigenic microenvironment, resulting in disease progression (right). To shift the balance to either end of the equilibrium, a concerted effort by multiple TH subtypes are necessary and may not be achieved by alteration in the functional state of a single TH subtype.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Therapeutic targeting of tumor associated antigens and neoantigens activate anti- vs. protumorigenic CD4+ TH cell subtypes. Therapeutic targeting of oncodrivers/TAA/self-antigens may stimulate tumor immune response differently than strategies involving neoantigens. (A) Intratumoral balance of anti- and protumorigenic CD4+ TH immune cell population maintain the equilibrium of inflammatory (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-6, IL-9, IL-21) and inhibitory cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, TGF-β) in cancer cell and determine overall immune response to therapy. (B) When tumor cells express self-antigens/TAA/oncodrivers (blue spheres), due to low abundance and weak immunogenicity of these antigens, effective immunotherapy targeting these proteins may require a more extensive shift in the balance of anti- vs pro-tumor immune effector populations, including recruitment and activation of all anti-tumorigenic TH1/TH9/Tfh populations (green arrow) and suppression of all pro-tumorigenic TH2/TH17/Treg/MDSC function (red arrow). Conversely, highly antigenic and abundant neoantigens (green spheres) may be sufficient to stimulate anti-tumor immune response either by (C) driving up infiltration and hyperactivation of primarilyTH1, along with TH9 and Tfh immunostimulatory response (green arrow) with minimal changes in the inhibitory immune cell function (grey arrow) or by (D) drastic downregulation of immunosuppressive response by TH2/TH17/Treg/MDSC cells (red arrow) without a significant change in the immunostimulatory population of TH1/TH9/Tfh cells (grey arrow) (light green, TH1; red, TH2; orange, TH9; blue, Tfh; dark green, TH17; grey, Treg; purple, MDSC).
Figure 4
Figure 4
CD4+ T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapeutic strategies that activate CD4+ T cells and their downstream effector immune cells for cancer treatment are depicted. Therapeutic vaccination includes tumor antigenic peptides, viral vector-based vaccine and DNA based vaccine that can mediate CD4+ T cells immune responses. DC-based vaccines can prime CD4+ T cells and create signals to activate cytotoxic CD8+ T cells differentiation and anti-tumor function. Adoptive transfer of tumor specific CD4+ T cells is another attractive immunotherapy approach which helps to develop specific and strong anti-tumor immune reaction. Chimeric antigen receptors can also redirect CD4+ T cells and provide activation signals to recognize cancer cells to eliminate them. Blockade of immune checkpoints PD1, PD-L1 and CTLA4 by antibodies can prevent tumor associated immunosuppressive environment and enhance tumor specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells immune responses.

References

    1. Tay RE, Richardson EK, Toh HC. Revisiting the Role of CD4(+) T Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy-New Insights Into Old Paradigms. Cancer Gene Ther (2020) 1–2:5–17. 10.1038/s41417-020-0183-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borst J, Ahrends T, Babala N, Melief CJM, Kastenmuller W. Cd4(+) T Cell Help in Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol (2018) 18(10):635–47. 10.1038/s41577-018-0044-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raskov H, Orhan A, Christensen JP, Gögenur I. Cytotoxic Cd8(+) T Cells in Cancer and Cancer Immunotherapy. Br J Cancer (2020) 124:359–67. 10.1038/s41416-020-01048-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bedoui S, Heath WR, Mueller SN. Cd4(+) T-cell Help Amplifies Innate Signals for Primary CD8(+) T-Cell Immunity. Immunol Rev (2016) 272(1):52–64. 10.1111/imr.12426 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byrne A, Savas P, Sant S, Li R, Virassamy B, Luen SJ, et al. . Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells in Breast Cancer Control and Immunotherapy Responses. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2020) 17(6):341–8. 10.1038/s41571-020-0333-y - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms