Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;91(7-8):E465-E473.
doi: 10.1111/ans.16937. Epub 2021 May 20.

Influence of positive margins on tumour recurrence and overall survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Affiliations

Influence of positive margins on tumour recurrence and overall survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Luz Divina Juez et al. ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Incidence of positive surgical margins after curative gastrectomy ranges from 1% to 20%. It has been suggested that positive surgical margin is an adverse prognosis factor, with a higher local recurrence and worse overall survival (OS). However, the management of these patients remains unclear.

Methods: A total of 267 patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2010 and December 2018 in our centre were enrolled in this study. Post-operative histological analysis revealed positive resection margins in 18 patients (8%). Clinicopathological features and outcome of patients undergoing gastrectomy with negative and positive margins were compared.

Results: Patients with positive margins were associated with higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, T stage, N stage, median number of positive nodes, diffuse Lauren type, whole stomach involved and poorly differentiated tumours. Local recurrence was described in 50% of cases with positive margins. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the TNM stage was the only independent prognostic factor associated with recurrence. OS for positive margins at 1, 3 and 5 years was 75%, 57% and 26%, respectively. The median survival in patients with positive margins was 38.33 versus 81.17 months for R0 patients (p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.041, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.07, sex (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.22-3.30) and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were independent factors of OS.

Conclusion: Positive resection margin was an indication of advanced and more aggressive disease rather than an independent prognosis factor for OS or recurrence in gastric cancer.

Keywords: R1; gastrectomy; gastric cancer; overall survival; positive margins; prognosis; recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chen JD, Yang XP, Shen JG, Hu WX, Yuan XM, Wang LB. Prognostic improvement of reexcision for positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:229-34.
    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v38-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw350.
    1. Ryu KW, Park YS, Kwon OK, Oh J, Lee HH, Kong SH, et al. Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer. 2019;19:1-48.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Oesophago-gastric cancer: assessment and management in adults. NICE Guidel. 2018;4:970-6. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng83.
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (Ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2016;20:1-19.

LinkOut - more resources